CASE: I-485 Adjustment of Status / EB-3 I-140

EMPLOYER: Public School District in Mohave Valley, AZ

APPLICANT: Filipina Elementary School Teacher in Laughlin, NV

Our client has an employer willing to do an I-140 Petition for her. Our client has a Bachelor’s degree in Elementary Education, a valid Arizona Teaching license, and has worked for her current employer since July 2014. Based on our client’s education and work background, she is eligible for EB-3 classification for her I-140 petition.  We were retained in June 2019.

Prior to filing PERM, our firm prepared the prevailing wage request, job order, advertisements, internal job posting, recruitment report, and all other steps which are important pre-PERM filing. Take note that the PERM application could be filed at least 60 days from the job posting date or 30 days from the last ad. Within a week from our retention, the prevailing wage request was filed.  After we obtained the PW determination, our office filed the job order on October 14, 2019.  On January 10, 2020, we filed PERM. 

On July 29, 2020, the Department of Labor issued an audit. The DOL requested documents from Petitioner to determine whether the recruitment process was done properly. In response to the Audit request, our office prepared the response to Audit brief along with Employer’s declaration, notice of filing, and recruitment documentation on August 14, 2020.   

On December 21, 2020, the Department of Labor denied the PERM application due to non-receipt of the Audit response. In this case though, the 45-page audit response (including the audit, the cover letter, and all the supporting documents) was delivered by August 17, 2020, which was way before the deadline of August 31, 2020. Our office filed Motion to Reconsider to the Department of Labor on December 22, 2020. Eventually, on May 13, 2021, the PERM Labor Certification was approved – an EB3 position for the Filipina beneficiary. 

We then proceeded with the I-140 Petition filing. We submitted the “ability to pay” letter for the I-140 petition application. We included the job offer letter, employer’s tax records, and other necessary supporting documents.

The I-140 Petition was filed on June 10, 2021 via regular processing service. We also filed her I-485 adjustment of status application simultaneously since her priority date was current. On September 7, 2021, our office filed a premium processing upgrade request to the USCIS. On September 22, 2021, the I-140 EB3 Petition for our Filipina client was approved without any Request for Evidence (RFE). On April 27, 2022, the I-485 adjustment of status applications for our client and her family members were approved by the USCIS. 

{ 0 comments }

CASE: I-130 (Petition for Parent) and Adjustment of Status
CLIENT: Filipina
LOCATION: Laughlin, NV

Our client retained us to petition for his mother who came to the U.S. from the Philippines. Our client is a naturalized US citizen and his mother came to the United States in July 2021 with a B-2 visa from the Philippines. He contacted our office in August of 2020 and discussed with us regarding his I-130 petition and his mother’s adjustment of status application. After consultation, he retained our office on August 3, 2021. 

Our firm prepared and filed the I-130 Immigrant Visa Petition and the I-485 Adjustment of Status Application on September 9, 2021.  Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices, fingerprint appointment, and work permits all came on time. On March 31, 2022, our client’s adjustment of status application was approved.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: EB-2 I-485

EMPLOYER: Public School District

APPLICANT: Filipina Elementary Special Education Teacher in Laughlin, NV

Our client has a current employer that was willing to petition for a second-preference I-140.  Our client has a Bachelor’s degree in Education, a valid Arizona Teaching license, and has more than 5 years of experience as a Special Education Teacher. Based on our client’s education and work background, our office determined that she is eligible for EB-2 classification for her I-140 petition.  Our client eventually retained us in May 2020.  

Prior to filing PERM, our firm prepared the prevailing wage request, job order, advertisements, internal job posting, recruitment report, and all other steps which are important pre-PERM filing. Take note that the PERM application could be filed at least 60 days from the job posting date or 30 days from the last ad. Within a week from our retention, the prevailing wage request was filed.  After we obtained the PW determination, our office filed the job order on October 15, 2020.  On January 8, 2021, we filed PERM. On July 6, 2021, the PERM Labor Certification was approved without any audit – an EB2 position for the Filipina beneficiary. 

We then proceeded with the I-140 Petition filing. We submitted the “ability to pay” letter for the I-140 petition application. We included the job offer letter, employer’s tax records, and other necessary supporting documents.

The I-140 Petition was filed on July 29, 2021 via premium processing service. However, on August 5, 2021, the USCIS issued a Request for Evidence (RFE) and requested our client to submit her past experience verification letter from her former employer in the Philippines. Our office filed the Response to RFE on August 10, 2021. On August 19, 2021, the I-140 EB2 Petition for our Filipina client was approved. 

Once her I-140 petition was approved, she retained our office again for the adjustment of status applications for her and her immediate family members. On September 10, 2021, our office filed the I-485 adjustment of status applications. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices and fingerprint appointment came on time. Eventually, on December 10, 2021, she and her family members’ green card applications were approved. Her adjustment of status application was approved within 3 months from the filing date.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: Marriage-Based Adjustment of Status

CLIENT: Turkish

LOCATION: Reno, NV

Our client is from Turkey who came to the U.S. on a J-1 Visa in August 2016 as an exchange student. In October 2019, she married her U.S. citizen spouse. She wished to apply for a waiver of the two year foreign residency requirement so that she can file her adjustment of status application along with her husband’s I-130 petition.  

She retained our office on January 13, 2020. Thereafter, our office prepared for the waiver request through a No Objection Statement (NOS) from the Turkish Embassy. Every country’s Embassy maintains different procedures with regard to the J-1 No Objection Statement waiver.  Our office contacted the Turkish Embassy in D.C. to pursue the waiver for our client.  The Embassy requested several documents including a statement of reason for the waiver and Turkish National ID.

On February 5, 2020, the J-1 Waiver (Form DS-3035) Application was filed to the Department of State.  We also sent a request to the Turkish Embassy to issue a No Objection Statement and recommend this waiver based on the fact that our client wants to adjust her status based on her marriage to a U.S. citizen spouse. 

Eventually, the Turkish Embassy issued a No Objection Statement for our client, and sent this letter to the State Department’s Waiver Review Division.  On June 15, 2020, the Waiver Review Division issued a favorable recommendation based on the No Objection statement. On July 13, 2020, the USCIS issued an I-612 approval notice for the waiver of our client’s two-year foreign residency requirement. 

Once her J-1 waiver was approved, our client retained our office again for her adjustment of status application. Our firm prepared and filed the I-130 Petition and I-485Adjustment of Status Application on July 3, 2020.  Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices, fingerprint appointment, and work permits all came on time. Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our clients through conference calls. On May 14, 2021, our client was interviewed at the Reno, Nevada USCIS office.  The interview went well, and eventually, on May 28, 2021, her green card application was approved.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: I-130 / I-485 Adjustment of Status

 NATIONALITY:  Filipina

 LOCATION:  Las Vegas, NV

Our client came from the Philippines on a J-1 in July 2017 to work as a teacher. Based on her DS-2019, she was subject to the two-year foreign residency requirement. After her authorized stay period expired, she remained in the United States. 

In June 2019, she got married to her U.S. citizen husband and later on consulted with our firm for her J-1 visa waiver prior to applying for adjustment of status. If someone is subject to the two-year foreign residency requirement, he or she cannot get a green card in the United States until he or she fulfills the requirement or obtains a waiver.

Upon retention, our office prepared a waiver request through a No Objection Statement (NOS) from the Philippine Embassy in the United States through the EVP in the Philippines.

On July 19, 2019, the J-1 Waiver Application (Form DS-3035) was filed to the Department of State.  On September 10, 2019, our office sent our client’s materials to the Waiver Review Committee in Manila, Philippines.  Then, the Waiver Review Committee forwarded the materials and favorable recommendation to the Philippine Embassy in D.C. who eventually issued a No Objection Statement. On December 12, 2019, the Waiver Review Division issued a favorable recommendation based on the No Objection statement.  Eventually, on December 23, 2019, the USCIS issued an I-612 approval notice for the waiver. 

Once her J-1 waiver was approved, our client retained our office again for her adjustment of status application. Our firm prepared and filed the I-130 Petition and I-485 Adjustment of Status Application on December 17, 2019.  Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices, fingerprint appointment, and work permits all came on time. Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our clients through conference calls. On January 12, 2021, our client was interviewed at the Las Vegas, NV USCIS office.  The interview went well, and eventually, on the same day of the interview, her green card application was approved.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: J-1 Waiver (No Objection Statement)

NATIONALITY: Philippines

LOCATION: Las Vegas, NV

Our client came from the Philippines on a J-1 in July 2017 to work as a teacher. According to her DS-2019, she was subject to the two-year foreign residency requirement. After her authorized stay period expired, she remained in the United States. 

In June 2019, she got married to her U.S. citizen husband and later on consulted with our firm for her J-1 visa waiver prior to applying for adjustment of status. If someone is subject to the two-year foreign residency requirement, he or she cannot get a green card in the United States until he or she fulfills the requirement or obtains a waiver.

Upon retention, our office promptly prepared a waiver request through a No Objection Statement (NOS) from the Philippine Embassy in the United States and eventually the EVP in the Philippines.

On July 19, 2019, the J-1 Waiver Application (Form DS-3035) was filed to the Department of State.  On September 10, 2019, our office sent our client’s materials to the Waiver Review Committee in Manila, Philippines.  Then, the Waiver Review Committee forwarded the materials and favorable recommendation to the Philippine Embassy in D.C. who eventually issued a No Objection Statement.

On December 12, 2019, the Waiver Review Division issued a favorable recommendation based on the No Objection statement.  Eventually, on December 23, 2019, the USCIS issued an I-612 approval notice for the waiver. Now, our client can file for her adjustment status application along with her U.S. Citizen husband’s I-130 petition for her.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: I-485 / I-140 (EB-1C Category: Executives and Managers of Multinational Organizations)

APPLICANT: Filipino Executive

LOCATION: Las Vegas, NV

Our client is the CEO of a multinational adventure travel company in Las Vegas.  He is from the Philippines, and has worked for its parent company as an Executive. He came to the United States in January 2015 on a L-1A visa to open a new office.  Our client eventually retained us for his I-140 EB1C and subsequent I-485 adjustment of status application.

An employer can petition for its foreign employee under INA § 203(b)(1)(C) if it demonstrates the following: (C) Certain multinational executives and managers – An alien is described in this subparagraph if the alien, in the 3 years preceding the time of the alien’s application for classification and admission into the United States under this subparagraph, has been employed for at least 1 year by a firm or corporation or other legal entity or an affiliate or subsidiary thereof and the alien seeks to enter the United States in order to continue to render services to the same employer or to a subsidiary or affiliate thereof in a capacity that is managerial or executive.

According to the INA §101(a)(44), 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(44) and 8 C.F.R §204.5(j)(2), “executive capacity” means an assignment in an organization in which the employee primarily: (1) Directs the management of the organization or a component or function; (2) Establishes goals and policies; (3) Exercise wide latitude in discretionary decision making; and (4) Receives only general supervision or direction from higher level executives, board of directors or stockholders.

Also, above the mentioned statutes define “managerial capacity” as an assignment with the organization in which the employee personally: (1) Manages the organization, department, subdivision, function or component; (2) Supervises and controls the work of other supervisory, professional or managerial employees, or manages an essential function within the organization or department or subdivision of the organization; (3) Has authority to hire and fire or recommend personnel actions (if another directly supervises employees), or if no direct supervision, functions at a senior level; and (4) Exercises discretion over day-to-day operations of the activity or function.

After our office was retained, we prepared a thorough cover letter and obtained all necessary supporting documents from our client and the petitioning company. In our brief, we clearly demonstrated that our client met the requirements set forth in the INA §203(b)(1)(C).  First, the prospective U.S. employer (Petitioner-Company) has been doing business for at least 1 year. Second, the prospective employer (Petitioner) in the United States is the same employer or a subsidiary or affiliate of the firm or corporation or other legal entity by which the alien was employed abroad.  Third, if the worker is already employed in the United States, he or she was employed outside the United States for at least 1 year in the 3 years preceding admission as a non-immigrant in an executive or managerial capacity by the petitioner or by its parent branch, subsidiary, or affiliate. Last, the alien is to be employed in the United States in a managerial or executive capacity.

In this case, the Petitioner-company has been doing business for 3 years in the United States. In addition, Petitioner-Company is the wholly-owned subsidiary of its Filipino parent company where our client was employed for 6 years. Moreover, our client was employed outside the U.S. for at least 1 year in the 3 years preceding admission as a non-immigrant in an Executive or Managerial Capacity by the Petitioner’s parent company in the Philippines.  Our client served as an executive for the parent company. Lastly, our client is to be employed in the United States as a president for the petitioner.

On the application package, we included a detailed job offer letter, employment verification letter from our client’s previous employer (parent company), an organization chart, and a dispatch order.  Also, we included evidence regarding the relationship between the Petitioner-Company and its Parent company in the Philippines. The evidence included a copy of the certificate of ownership, a copy of the articles of incorporation, a copy the business registration certificate, a copy of the financial statements.  The I-140 Petition was filed on September 11, 2017. On July 11, 2018, the I-140 petition was approved with no Requests for Evidence.

While the I-140 petition was pending, our office filed the I-485 adjustment of status applications for him and his wife. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices and fingerprint appointment came on time.

Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our client via conference call as well. On April 8, 2019, our client was interviewed at Las Vegas, Nevada USCIS office. Eventually, on May 1, 2019, our clients’ green card applications were approved.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: N-400 (Citizenship / Naturalization)

APPLICANT: Filipina

LOCATION: Las Vegas, NV

Our client contacted us in September 2017 to seek legal representation for her naturalization and citizenship N-400 application. She came to the United States from the Philippines and she obtained her green card in December 2014 through her marriage to her US Citizen husband.

Her N-400 application was filed on October 13, 2017 with all supporting documents. Prior to her citizenship interview, our office prepared her via conference calls.  On December 20, 2018, our client appeared at the Las Vegas, NV USCIS office for her naturalization interview. Our client answered all questions correctly and passed her naturalization and citizenship interview. Eventually, her application was approved on January 7, 2019. Her oath taking is scheduled in which she will become a naturalized U.S. Citizen.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: I-140 (EB-1C Category: Executives and Managers of Multinational Organizations)

EMPLOYER: Multinational Travel Company

BENEFICIARY: Filipino

LOCATION: Las Vegas, NV

Our client is the president of a multinational travel company in Las Vegas.  He is from the Philippines, and he has worked for the parent company as an Executive. He came to the United States in January 2015 on an a L-1A visa to work for the current petitioner company (wholly-owned subsidiary of his previous employer).  He contacted our firm in August 2017, and discussed with us his chances of getting a green card. Based on our client’s education and professional background and his current position at the worksite, our office determined that he was eligible for the EB-1C classification. Our client eventually retained us for his I-140 and subsequent I-485 adjustment of status application.

An employer can petition for its foreign employee under INA § 203(b)(1)(C) if it demonstrates the following: (C) Certain multinational executives and managers – An alien is described in this subparagraph if the alien, in the 3 years preceding the time of the alien’s application for classification and admission into the United States under this subparagraph, has been employed for at least 1 year by a firm or corporation or other legal entity or an affiliate or subsidiary thereof and the alien seeks to enter the United States in order to continue to render services to the same employer or to a subsidiary or affiliate thereof in a capacity that is managerial or executive.

According to the INA §101(a)(44), 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(44) and 8 C.F.R §204.5(j)(2), “executive capacity” means an assignment in an organization in which the employee primarily: (1) Directs the management of the organization or a component or function; (2) Establishes goals and policies; (3) Exercise wide latitude in discretionary decision making; and (4) Receives only general supervision or direction from higher level executives, board of directors or stockholders.

Also, above the mentioned statutes define “managerial capacity” as an assignment with the organization in which the employee personally: (1) Manages the organization, department, subdivision, function or component; (2) Supervises and controls the work of other supervisory, professional or managerial employees, or manages an essential function within the organization or department or subdivision of the organization; (3) Has authority to hire and fire or recommend personnel actions (if another directly supervises employees), or if no direct supervision, functions at a senior level; and (4) Exercises discretion over day-to-day operations of the activity or function.

After our office was retained, we prepared a thorough cover letter and obtained all necessary supporting documents from our client and the petitioning company. In our brief, we clearly demonstrated that our client met the requirements set forth in the INA §203(b)(1)(C).  First, the prospective U.S. employer (Petitioner-Company) has been doing business for at least 1 year. Second, the prospective employer (Petitioner) in the United States is the same employer or a subsidiary or affiliate of the firm or corporation or other legal entity by which the alien was employed abroad.  Third, if the worker is already employed in the United States, he or she was employed outside the United States for at least 1 year in the 3 years preceding admission as a non-immigrant in an executive or managerial capacity by the petitioner or by its parent branch, subsidiary, or affiliate. Last, the alien is to be employed in the United States in a managerial or executive capacity.

In this case, the Petitioner-company has been doing business for 3 years in the United States. In addition, Petitioner-Company is the wholly-owned subsidiary of its Filipino parent company where our client was employed for 6 years. Moreover, our client was employed outside the U.S. for at least 1 year in the 3 years preceding admission as a non-immigrant in an Executive or Managerial Capacity by the Petitioner’s parent company in the Philippines.  Our client served as an executive for the parent company. Lastly, our client is to be employed in the United States as a president for the petitioner.

On the application package, we included a detailed job offer letter, employment verification letter from our client’s previous employer (parent company), an organization chart, and a dispatch order.  Also, we included evidence regarding the relationship between the Petitioner-Company and its Parent company in the Philippines. The evidence included a copy of the certificate of ownership, a copy of the articles of incorporation, a copy the business registration certificate, a copy of the financial statements.  The I-140 Petition was filed on September 11, 2017. On July 11, 2018, the I-140 petition was approved with no Requests for Evidence.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: J-2 Waiver of Two-Year Foreign Residency Requirement Post-Divorce
NATIONALITY: Kenyan
LOCATION: Las Vegas, NV

Our client is a citizen of Kenya who came to the U.S. on a J-2 Visa in 2007.  She came with her husband who held a J-1 Visa as a Ph.D student.  Both were subject to the two-year foreign residency requirement.

Unfortunately, while they are residing in the United States, her marriage did not work out well. Eventually, she got divorced from her ex-husband.  Thereafter, she lost her J-2 status in the United States; but she was still subject to the two-year foreign residency requirement.  Later in July 2015, she married her U.S. Citizen husband.  He intends to file I-130 petition for her, but she could not file adjustment of status in the U.S. and change her status to other non-immigrant visa in the United States because of the 2 year foreign residency requirement.

In August of this year, our client contacted our office. She retained our firm to do her J-2 waiver on August 8, 2016. On August 11, 2016 the J-2 Waiver (DS-3035) was filed to the Department of State. We also sent a request to the DOS to be an interested government agency and recommend this waiver based on the fact that our client was divorced from the J-1 visa holder.  Eventually, on August 29, 2016, the DOS recommended to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) that our client be granted a waiver. Finally, the USCIS issued I-612 waiver approval notice on September 21, 2016.  Now, our client’s U.S. citizen husband can file I-130 petition for our client and our client can file an adjustment of status application (I-485) for her green card with a waiver.

{ 0 comments }