slide
Success Stories
If you need help in any aspect of immigration law, feel free to contact our office. We invite you to view our success stories.
slide
From Our Clients
Please read our compiled reviews from the internet, from Google to AVVO, on what our clients have said about our firm.
slide
Marriage
One of the fastest and most common immigration cases are those based on marriage to a US Citizen.
slide
Family and Relative Immigration
From immigration of children, parents, siblings, to cases involving 245(i), CSPA, and the death of a petitioner, we are here to help.
slide
H-1B
H-1B petitions for employment in specialty occupations, from computer analysts, engineers, nurse managers, accountants, architects, doctors, feel free to contact us.
slide
Asylum
Past persecution or fear of future persecution on account of politics, race, religion, social group, or nationality. Let us guide you in the asylum application process.
  • CONTACT US

    FREE CONSULTATIONS ............. 5005 Rockside Rd. Ste. 600 Cleveland Ohio 44131 ............. PH: (216) 573-3712 .................... FAX: (888) 513-6917
  • CLIENTS’ CHOICE AWARD

    Juan Paolo Pasia SarmientoClients’ ChoiceAward 2019
    Sung Hee YuClients’ ChoiceAward 2018
  • Success Stories

  • Padilla v Kentucky – Supreme Court on Immigration and Guilty Pleas at Criminal Courts

    by JP Sarmiento on April 4, 2010

    An alien who gets placed in removal proceedings due to criminal convictions used to have this recourse: lawyers obtain the transcript of the criminal court proceeding, check whether advisement (a warning that a guilty plea would lead to immigration consequences) was given by the judge (note that these are criminal court judges, not immigration judges), and if none was given file a Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea and Vacate Conviction. If it gets withdrawn and the case vacated, if that was the only basis for removability, then the alien is good to go. Maybe removal proceedings can be terminated, maybe an alternative form of relief could be sought.

    A lot of judges in recent years have started to be aware of this situation. So most of the time, advisement is given to these foreigners. Guilty pleas are sometimes still given despite the advisement, most of the time because barring any immigration consequences the specifics of which are unknown to foreigner at that time, the plea bargain seems to benefit the alien if he or she just pleads guilty – no jail time, probation is better than jail, the fine seems reasonable, community service is not that bad etc. So if a guilty plea was given despite the judge’s advisement, but the criminal defense attorney failed to advice the alien of the immigration consequences of his guilty plea, before this new Supreme Court case, there were limited ways to reopen the case.

    In Padilla v. Kentucky, the Supreme Court on March 31, 2010 held that a criminal defense counsel must inform noncitizen clients whether the plea carries a risk of deportation. This is an important case for foreigners facing deportation due to criminal convictions, who originally plead guilty at their criminal proceedings but was not given immigration advisement by their criminal defense attorney. Several cases can get reopened on this basis.

    If you have any questions, please fill out the free consultation form below, and we will respond as soon as possible privately. 

      captcha

      { 0 comments… add one now }