slide
Success Stories
If you need help in any aspect of immigration law, feel free to contact our office. We invite you to view our success stories.
slide
From Our Clients
Please read our compiled reviews from the internet, from Google to AVVO, on what our clients have said about our firm.
slide
Marriage
One of the fastest and most common immigration cases are those based on marriage to a US Citizen.
slide
Family and Relative Immigration
From immigration of children, parents, siblings, to cases involving 245(i), CSPA, and the death of a petitioner, we are here to help.
slide
H-1B
H-1B petitions for employment in specialty occupations, from computer analysts, engineers, nurse managers, accountants, architects, doctors, feel free to contact us.
slide
Asylum
Past persecution or fear of future persecution on account of politics, race, religion, social group, or nationality. Let us guide you in the asylum application process.
  • CONTACT US

    FREE CONSULTATIONS ............. 5005 Rockside Rd. Ste. 600 Cleveland Ohio 44131 ............. PH: (216) 573-3712 .................... FAX: (888) 513-6917
  • CLIENTS’ CHOICE AWARD

    Juan Paolo Pasia SarmientoClients’ ChoiceAward 2019
    Sung Hee YuClients’ ChoiceAward 2018
  • Success Stories

  • BIA on Service of an NTA to a Minor 14 Years or Older in Matter of Cubor-Cruz, 25 I & N Dec. 470 (BIA 2011)

    by JP Sarmiento on May 9, 2011

    On April 29, 2011, the Board of Immigration held that service of an NTA on a minor 14 years of age or older at the time of service is effective, even though notice was not also served on an adult with responsibility for the minor. In Matter of Cubor-Cruz, the Respondent was 17 years old at the time of entry to the United States, and was subject to removal proceedings. He was served in person with an NTA, and he failed to appear for his scheduled hearing before the Immigration Judge.  He argued that he did not receive proper notice of the hearing because the notice should have been given to his step-father or a legal guardian since he was only 17 years old at the time.

    The BIA rejected Respondent’s contention and held that nothing in the regulations or precedents precludes the Department of Homeland Security, as a matter of policy or practice, from also serving an adult when a minor is between the ages of 14 and 18.  Hence, in this case, the BIA concluded that the service of the Notice to Appear on the respondent’s step-father or another legal guardian was not required under the regulations.

    If you have any questions, please fill out the free consultation form below, and we will respond as soon as possible privately. 

      captcha

      Comments on this entry are closed.