CASE: I-140 (Derivative Beneficiary) and Adjustment of Status
CLIENT: Filipina
LOCATION: Houston, TX
Our client retained us for her green card application. Our client was born and raised in the Philippines. Her husband became a beneficiary of the approved EB-2 I-140 petition from his employer and got his green card in January 2016. She could have been a derivative applicant at the time of her husband’s green card filing, but she was not in the United States at that time. Nevertheless, we explained to our client that we can do I-824 and consular processing for her when she wants to permanently move to the United States.
In February 2016, her husband contacted our office to do an I-824 follow-to-join application to the USCIS so that our client can file an immigrant visa and come as a derivative beneficiary of the I-140 petition. He retained our office on February 26, 2016, to help bring our client to the States.
After we were retained, our office filed an I-824 follow-to-join application to the USCIS on March 8, 2016. After the I-824 was filed, everything went smoothly and the receipt notice came on time. The I-824 application was approved by the USCIS on August 22, 2016, and this case was transferred to the National Visa Center.
Nevertheless, in January 2017, our client visited the United States with her B-2 visitor’s visa. Once she came to the United States, she asked our office whether she can file adjustment of status application (instead of filing immigrant visa in the Philippines) in the United States. She retained our office for her adjustment of status process.
Once retained, our firm prepared and filed the Adjustment of Status Application on March 17, 2017, for our client. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices, fingerprint appointment, and a work permit all came on time. In December 2017, the USCIS schedule our client’s adjustment of status interview at Houston USCIS Field Office.
Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our client through conference calls. On January 22, 2018, our client was interviewed at the Houston USCIS Field office in Texas. Eventually, on February 26, 2018, her green card application was approved.
{ 0 comments }
CASE: PERM Labor Certification
EMPLOYER: E-Commerce Merchandiser Employer
BENEFICIARY: Korean Operations Research Analyst
Our client is from South Korea and his prospective employer was willing to do an immigration petition for him, second-preference. Our client has a Master’s degree in Business Administration. After talking to our client, our firm concluded that his employer can petition him as an Operations Research Analyst. Based on our client’s education and work background, our office determined that he is clearly eligible for EB-2 classification.
Prior to filing PERM, our firm prepared the prevailing wage request, job order, advertisements, internal job posting, recruitment report, and all other steps which are important pre-PERM filing. Take note that PERM could be filed at least 60 days from the job posting date or 30 days from the last ad. On May 18, 2017, the prevailing wage request was filed. After we obtained Prevailing Wage determination, our office filed the job order on August 8, 2017. On October 11, 2017, we promptly filed PERM. Eventually, on March 19, 2018, the PERM Labor Certification was approved – an EB2 position for the Korean beneficiary. Now our client can file the I-140 petition.
{ 0 comments }
CASE: PERM Labor Certification
EMPLOYER: Public Schools District
BENEFICIARY: Filipina Speech Language Pathologist
LOCATION: Kansas
Our client has a current employer that was willing to petition her for a second-preference petition (I-140). Our client has a master’s degree in speech language pathology, a valid Kansas speech language pathologist license, and has worked for her current employer since August 2014. Based on our client’s education and work background, our office determined that she is clearly eligible for EB-2 classification for her I-140 petition. Our client eventually retained us in November 2016.
Prior to filing PERM, our firm prepared the prevailing wage request, job order, advertisements, internal job posting, recruitment report, and all other steps which are important pre-PERM filing. Take note that the PERM application could be filed at least 60 days from the job posting date or 30 days from the last ad. Within a week from our retention, the prevailing wage request was filed. After we obtained the PW determination, our office filed the job order on March 21, 2017. On July 17, 2017, we promptly filed PERM.
However, on December 18, 2017, the Department of Labor issued a request for audit. The DOL requested documents from Petitioner to determine whether the recruitment process was done properly. In response to the Audit request, our office prepared the response to Audit brief along with Employer’s declaration, notice of filing, and recruitment documentation on December 28, 2017.
Eventually, on March 19, 2018, the PERM Labor Certification was approved – an EB2 position for the Filipina beneficiary. Since her priority date is current, our client can file the I-140, I-485 green card application, and I-765 simultaneously.
{ 0 comments }
CASE: H-1B Extension
PETITIONER: Elementary School
BENEFICIARY: Filipina Elementary School Teacher
LOCATION: New Mexico
Our client is a public grant elementary school for Native Indians in New Mexico. They contacted our office to seek assistance for their foreign employee. The beneficiary is from the Philippines and she obtained her Bachelor’s degree in English. The proffered position for the Beneficiary is an elementary school teacher which we argued qualifies as a specialty occupation.
The foreign beneficiary in this case already had her H-1B from our client last year. She also has an approved I-140 petition which allows her to get three year extension. Her H-1B status was not yet expired, and she wanted to extend her H-1B status.
After retention, our office promptly filed the H-1B visa petition with various supporting documents on December 13, 2017 via regular processing. Since this petition was based on an extension, this petition was exempt from the annual cap of the H-1B. Thus, we could file prior to April 1, 2018. Eventually, our client’s H-1B Petition was approved on March 8, 2018 without any RFE. Now the Beneficiary can work for her Petitioner-Employer as an H-1B visa holder and she can continuously work there.
{ 0 comments }
CASE: PERM Labor Certification
EMPLOYER: Civil Engineering Company in California
BENEFICIARY: Filipino Building Project Engineer Manager
Our client is from the Philippines. His prospective employer is willing to do an immigration petition for him, second-preference. Our client has a Bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering and has more than 5 years of work experience as a Design and Structural Engineer. After talking to our client, our firm concluded that his employer can petition him as a Building Project Engineer Manager. Based on our client’s educational, professional and working backgrounds, our office determined that he is clearly eligible for EB-2 classification.
Prior to filing PERM, our firm prepared the prevailing wage request, job order, advertisements, internal job posting, recruitment report, and all other steps which are important pre-PERM filing. Take note that PERM could be filed at least 60 days from the job posting date or 30 days from the last ad. On January 30, 2017, the prevailing wage request was filed. After we obtained Prevailing Wage determination, our office filed the job order on April 26, 2017. On September 18, 2017, we promptly filed PERM. Eventually, on March 8, 2018, the PERM Labor Certification was approved – an EB2 position for the Filipino beneficiary. Now our client can file the I-140 petition.
{ 0 comments }
CASE: I-140 / National Interest Waiver
CLIENT: Korean
LOCATION: Columbus, OH
Our client contacted us in October 2016 about the possibility of doing a National Interest Waiver self-petition. He is a researcher from South Korea and he is an exceptional researcher and scientist in the field of plant developmental biology research.
Our client’s significant contributions have placed him at the pinnacle of his field. He has pioneered the study of leaf and flower development and provided novel insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying floral transition from vegetative cells. Specifically, our client characterized bona fide regulators of cell proliferation of aerial lateral organs and floral transition. Because of his innovative experimental research, our client’s research works were highly evaluated by the reviewers of various journals and by colleagues and experts in the field.
Upon review of his credentials and qualifications, our office determined that he was definitely qualified for the National Interest Waiver (NIW) category. Being qualified for NIW is beneficial since you would not need an employer nor family member to petition for you for green card purposes. You’d be eligible for a self-petition and unless you are from China or India, in which case you’d still have to wait for priority dates to be current, you would be eligible to apply for adjustment of status (green card) immediately without any lag in priority dates.
As a primer, NIW applicants must have a master’s or higher degree. While we prepared his case, the AAO set the new standards for NIW cases in Matter of Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016). Under the new standard, the petitioner must demonstrate that the foreign national’s proposed endeavor has both substantial merit and national importance. Next, it must be shown that he or she is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor. Finally, the petitioner seeking the waiver needs to demonstrate that, on balance, it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements. Id.
Our office prepared a 21-page brief for our client’s NIW filing. Our client also obtained 9 letters of recommendation from his colleagues and internationally-recognized researchers. Our office also included his publication records, presentation records, and conference materials in the NIW application. We demonstrated that our client is one of the few elite researchers who have made significant and substantial contributions to his field of endeavor, that he is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor, and it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the requirements of a job offer and thus of a labor certification for our client. His NIW application contained 34 exhibits (Exhibit A to HH).
Our office filed his I-140(NIW) petition to the USCIS Nebraska Service Center on June 1, 2017. Eventually, on March 6, 2018, the USCIS approved his I-140 petition without any Requests for Evidence. When we filed his I-140, he concurrently filed his I-485 adjustment of status application. His adjustment of status application will be approved soon as well.
{ 0 comments }
CASE: I-140 (EB-3 Category) / Schedule A / Request to retain earlier priority date
EMPLOYER: Physicians’ Office
BENEFICIARY: Chinese Nurse Practitioner
LOCATION: Pennsylvania
Our client is a certified nurse practitioner. Her prospective employer was willing to petition her for a second-preference employment immigrant visa petition (I-140). Since she was a certified nurse practitioner, she was eligible for “Schedule A” classification. With our office’s help, on July 25, 2017, without any Request for Evidence (RFE), the USCIS Nebraska Service Center approved her EB-2 I-140 petition.
However, since she is a Chinese national her priority date is later than the other Chinese nationals who have third-preference I-140 petition approval. Thus, our client would like to downgrade her approved EB-2 petition to the third preference so that she can file the adjustment of status application earlier. After the consolation with our office, she and her prospective employer decide to file the third I-140 petition while retain her old priority date.
According to 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(e):
A petition approved on behalf of an alien under sections 203(b) (1), (2), or (3) of the Act accords the alien the priority date of the approved petition for any subsequently filed petition for any classification under sections 203(b) (1), (2), or (3) of the Act for which the alien may qualify. In the event that the alien is the beneficiary of multiple petitions under sections 203(b) (1), (2), or (3) of the Act, the alien shall be entitled to the earliest priority date. A petition revoked under sections 204(e) or 205 of the Act will not confer a priority date, nor will any priority date be established as a result of a denied petition. A priority date is not transferable to another alien.
Our client retained our office again on October 5, 2017. On October 13, 2017, our office filed the I-140 EB-3 petition for our client. In the cover brief, we citied aforementioned statutory language, and explained that our client is eligible for retaining old priority date for this subsequent I-140 petition, requesting the Eb3 classification based on the same labor certification which was also filed by the same petitioner.
However, on December 15, 2017, the USCIS issued the Request for Evidence (RFE) and requested the Petitioner’s most recent tax return document to determine its ability to pay. On January 26, 2018, our office filed the Response to Request for Evidence along with the Petitioner’s most recent tax return. Eventually, on February 12, 2018, the USCIS approved our client’s I-140 EB-3 petition with old priority date.
{ 0 comments }
CASE: I-140 / National Interest Waiver
CLIENT: Pakistani
LOCATION: Boston, MA
Our client contacted us in May 2017 about the possibility of doing a National Interest Waiver self-petition. He is a researcher from Pakistan and he is an exceptional researcher and scientist in the field of microbiology and medical science.
Our client’s significant contributions have placed him at the pinnacle of his field. He is an extraordinary researcher and scientist in the field of Microbiology and Medical Sciences. Throughout his research career, our client has been an outstanding scientist whose work is of critical importance in the prevention of certain human infections. Acanthamoeba is a dangerous pathogen and a causative agent of serious human infections. The most distressing fact is it forms a resistant double walled cyst inside human tissues and poses a key challenge in the successful treatment of the infection. To date, very little is known about the biology of encystation, however our client has thoroughly studied the process in the past few years. He has efficiently developed a liquid medium method to study encystation and using this method for the first time he identified the role of two key enzymes cellulose synthase and xylose isomerase during encystation using gene silencing technology. Because of his innovative experimental research, our client’s research works were highly evaluated by the reviewers of various journals and by colleagues and experts in the field.
Upon review of his credentials and qualifications, our office determined that he was definitely qualified for the National Interest Waiver (NIW) category. Being qualified for NIW is beneficial since you would not need an employer nor family member to petition for you for green card purposes. You’d be eligible for a self-petition and unless you are from China or India, in which case you’d still have to wait for priority dates to be current, you would be eligible to apply for adjustment of status (green card) immediately without any lag in priority dates.
As a primer, NIW applicants must have a master’s or higher degree. While we prepared his case, the AAO set the new standards for NIW cases in Matter of Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016). Under the new standard, the petitioner must demonstrate that the foreign national’s proposed endeavor has both substantial merit and national importance. Next, it must be shown that he or she is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor. Finally, the petitioner seeking the waiver needs to demonstrate that, on balance, it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements. Id.
Our office prepared a 17-page brief for our client’s NIW filing. Our client also obtained 9 letters of recommendation from his colleagues and internationally-recognized researchers. Our office also included his publication records, presentation records, and conference materials in the NIW application. We demonstrated that our client is one of the few elite researchers who have made significant and substantial contributions to his field of endeavor, that he is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor, and it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the requirements of a job offer and thus of a labor certification for our client.
Our office filed his I-140(NIW) petition to the USCIS Texas Service Center on October 19, 2017. Eventually, on February 12, 2018, the USCIS approved his I-140 petition without any Requests for Evidence. Now, he can file his I-485 adjustment of status application along with his approved I-140 petition.
{ 0 comments }
CASE: Adjustment of Status (I-485) / I-140 (EB-3)
APPLICANT: Korean
LOCATION: Cleveland, OH
Our client is from South Korea, who is currently working in the U.S. on his H-1B status. His current employer was willing to do an immigration petition for him, third-preference. Our client has a Bachelor of Chemical Engineering Degree and has worked for the current employer as a Product Safety / Quality Assurance Director. After talking to our client, our firm concluded that his employer can petition him as a Product Safety / Quality Assurance Director. Based on our client’s education and work background, our office determined that he is eligible for EB-3 classification.
Prior to filing PERM, our firm prepared the prevailing wage request, job order, advertisements, internal job posting, recruitment report, and all other steps which are important pre-PERM filing. Take note that PERM could be filed at least 60 days from the job posting date or 30 days from the last ad. On February 5, 2016, the prevailing wage request was filed. After we obtained Prevailing Wage determination, our office filed the job order on May 5, 2016. On August 1, 2016, we promptly filed PERM. Eventually, on October 24, 2016, the PERM Labor Certification was approved – an EB3 position for the Korean beneficiary.
We then proceeded with the I-140 Petition filing. We submitted a cover brief with the “ability to pay” argument for the I-140 petition application. We included the job offer letter, employer’s tax records, and other necessary supporting documents. The I-140 Petition was filed on November 29, 2016 via premium processing service. Eventually, on December 5, 2016, the I-140 EB-3 Petition for our Korean client was approved without any Request for Evidence (RFE).
Once the I-140 petition was approved, our client retained our office again for his I-485 adjustment of status application. Our office filed an I-485 adjustment of status application for our client on November 9, 2016. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices and fingerprint appointment came on time.
Eventually, on February 13, 2018, the USCIS Nebraska Service Center approved our client’s adjustment of status application. Now, he finally is a green card holder.
{ 0 comments }
CASE: Immigrant Visa / I-140 (EB-2 Category) / Schedule A
EMPLOYER: Nursing Care Facility
BENEFICIARY: Filipino Nurse Manager in the Philippines
LOCATION: Manila, Philippines
Our client is in the Philippines. His prospective employer-sponsor was willing to petition him for a second-preference employment immigrant visa petition (I-140). Since he has a registered nurse license and the proffered position for him is a nurse manager at the nursing care facility, the petitioner wanted to try going for a “Schedule A” classification. They also wanted to do EB2 (requiring at least a Masters degree or Bachelors degree + 5 yrs experience).
The Department of Labor (DOL) maintains a schedule of occupations in its regulations, Schedule A included, for which the individual permanent labor certification procedure is not required. The schedule of pre-certified occupations is referred to as Schedule A, and is included in DOL regulations at 20 CFR 656.10. Based on an occupation’s inclusion on Schedule A, an employer may file an immigrant visa petition (I-140) directly with the (USCIS) without having to file a Labor Certification with the Department of Labor. Usually, prior to filing I-140 petitions (EB-2 or EB-3 category), the employer must file a Labor Certification to the Department of Labor. However, for Schedule A cases, the employer does not have to go through the labor certification process. We argued that the position of Health Services Manager should be classified under Schedule A. We argued that it falls under the broad spectrum of “professional nurse” occupations. We also argued that the job description has excerpts that fall under “professional nurse” and that the description justifies the requirements also of Bachelor’s degree in nursing and five years of related experiences.
Our client has a master’s degree in nursing and years of experience as a registered nurse. He also has a registered nursing license in the state of Texas. Our office was retained and we started on the Prevailing Wage Determination filing and other related matters.
Once the prevailing wage was determined, we filed the I-140 application on July 6, 2017 via premium processing. We included a job offer letter, the notice of filing, employment letter, and other necessary supporting documents. In our cover brief, we included the “ability to pay” argument and why the nurse manager position falls under a Schedule A and EB2 designation.
Eventually, on July 17, 2017, the USCIS Texas Service Center approved his EB-2 I-140 petition.
After the approval of the I-140 petition, our client retained us again for his immigrant visa processing. Once we were retained, our office filed the immigrant visa packets to the National Visa Center on September 13, 2017, who in turn forwarded the client’s materials to the U.S. Embassy in Manila, Philippines. An interview notice was set for the client at the U.S. Embassy in Philippines. On February 6, 2018, our client appeared at the U.S. Embassy in Manila, Philippines. Eventually, after the interview, the Immigrant Visa was issued for our client.
With the approved Immigrant Visa, our client can come to the United States immediately, and he will get his green card within two months of entry.
{ 0 comments }