CASE: I-140 (EB-2 Category) / Schedule A / Premium Processing

EMPLOYER: Health Clinic

BENEFICIARY: Filipino

LOCATION: New York, NY

Our client is a certified nurse practitioner. His current employer-sponsor (on OPT) was willing to petition him for a second-preference employment immigrant visa petition (I-140). Since he is a certified nurse practitioner, he is eligible for “Schedule A” classification.

The Department of Labor (DOL) maintains a schedule of occupations in its regulations, Schedule A included, for which the individual permanent labor certification procedure is not required. The schedule of pre-certified occupations is referred to as Schedule A, and is included in DOL regulations at 20 CFR 656.10. Based on an occupation’s inclusion on Schedule A, an employer may file an immigrant visa petition (I-140) directly with the (USCIS) without having to file a Labor Certification with the Department of Labor. Usually, prior to filing I-140 petitions (EB-2 or EB-3 category), the employer must file a Labor Certification to the Department of Labor. However, for Schedule A cases, the employer does not have to go through the labor certification process. We argued that the position of Nurse Practitioner is included in Schedule A.

Our client has both a Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in nursing. Our office was retained on January 9, 2014 and we started the Prevailing Wage Determination filing and other related matters.

Once the prevailing wage was determined, we filed the I-140 application on April 11, 2014 via premium processing. We included the job offer letter, the notice of filing, his pay stubs, and other necessary supporting documents. In our cover brief, we included the “ability to pay” argument and why nurse practitioners must fall under the Schedule A designation.

However, on April 24, 2014, the USCIS Texas Service Center issued a Request for Evidence (RFE) and requested petitioner-employer to explain recent ownership changes and further explanation on the entity arrangement. Our office prepared the response to RFE and filed it along with supplemental evidence on May 8, 2014 to the USCIS. On May 15, 2014, the USCIS Texas Service Center approved his EB-2 I-140 petition. Now, with the approved EB-2 I-140 petition (priority date for EB2 Philippines nationals is current), he can file his adjustment of status application at any time (he could have filed it simultaneously, but beneficiary wanted to make sure the I-140 was approved first).

{ 0 comments }

CASE: PERM Labor Certification

EMPLOYER: Taekwondo (Martial Arts) School

BENEFICIARY: Korean

LOCATION: Erie, PA

Our client is a former Taekwondo athlete, who is working as a Taekwondo coach who had a Taekwondo school willing to petition him for a second-preference petition (I-140).  Our client has a bachelor’s and a master’s degree in a related field and has coaching experience.

Ever since he came to the United States, he has maintained his status as an O-1 visa holder. However, he had previously applied for a green card application (Based on the EB-11 category) which was denied by the USCIS.

After talking to our client, our firm concluded that his potential employer can petition him as a Taekwondo Head Coach.  Second preference petitions for Koreans are current, which means that if a PERM Labor Certification for a second preference position gets approved, the I-140 and I-485 could be filed simultaneously. Based on our client’s educational, professional and working background, our office determined that he is eligible for EB-2 classification for his I-140 petition.  Our client eventually retained us in June 2012.

Prior to filing PERM, our firm prepared the prevailing wage request, job order, advertisements, internal job posting, recruitment report, and all other steps which are important pre-PERM filing. Take note that the PERM application could be filed at least 60 days from the job posting date or 30 days from the last ad. Within a week from our retention, the prevailing wage request was filed.  After we obtained the foreign degree evaluation report, our office filed the job order on October 5, 2012.  On January 14, 2013, we filed PERM.

However, on June 10, 2013, the Department of Labor issued a request for audit. The DOL requested documents from Petitioner to determine whether the recruitment process was done properly. In response to the Audit request, our office prepared the response to Audit brief along with Employer’s declaration, notice of filing, and recruitment documentation on June 26, 2013.

Eventually, on May 13, 2014, the PERM Labor Certification was approved – an EB2 position for the Korean beneficiary. Now our client can file the I-140, I-485 green card application, and I-765 simultaneously.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: H-1B Change of Employer

PETITIONER: Elementary School

BENEFICIARY: Filipina Elementary School Teacher

LOCATION: New Mexico

Our client is a public grant elementary school for native Indians in New Mexico. They contacted our office to seek assistance from for their foreign employee. The beneficiary is from the Philippines and she obtained her Bachelor’s degree in English. The proffered position for the Beneficiary is an elementary school teacher which we argued qualifies as a specialty occupation

The foreign beneficiary in this case already had her H-1B from her previous employer which was in a similar industry.  She also has an approved I-140 petition which allows her to get a three year extension. Her H-1B status was not yet expired, and she wanted to extend her H-1B status on a change of employer basis.

After retention, our office filed the H-1B visa petition with various supporting documents on January 20, 2014 via premium processing.  Since this petition was based on a change of employer, this petition was exempt from the annual cap of the H-1B.  Thus, we could file prior to April 1, 2014.

However, the USCIS issued a Request for Evidence for this petition on January 30, 2014. The USCIS requested the beneficiary to submit her teaching license, employment verification with her most recent employer, and W-2 and pay stubs from her most recent employer. Our office helped the beneficiary and filed a Response to RFE to USCIS on April 25, 2014. Eventually, our client’s H-1B Petition was approved on April 28, 2014.  Now the Beneficiary can work for her Petitioner-Employer as an H-1B visa holder and she can work there for the next three years.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: I-485 Based on Approved I-140 / National Interest Waiver

CLIENT: Korean

 LOCATION: Stanford, California

Our client contacted us in December 2012 about the possibility of doing a National Interest Waiver self-petition. He is a post-doctorate researcher and scientist in the field of Aerospace Engineering and Science, and is currently working as a post-doctorate researcher in an academic institution in Stanford, California.

Our client is an extraordinary researcher and engineer in the field of Aerospace Engineering Research; specifically, new aerospace propulsion technology such as SCRAM-JET, supersonic flow control, and plasma physics. His significant contributions have placed him at the pinnacle of the field of Aerospace engineering. Our client’s expertise is in the fields of plasma aided flow control, supersonic/hypersonic compressible flow and plasma assisted combustion. Throughout his research career, our client has provided innovative solutions for practical plasma flow control applications in supersonic and subsonic flows which were highly evaluated by the reviewers of various journals and by colleagues and experts in the field.

Upon review of his credentials and qualifications, our office determined that he was qualified for the National Interest Waiver (NIW) category. Being qualified for NIW is beneficial since you would not need an employer nor family member to petition for you for green card purposes. You’d be eligible for a self-petition and unless you are from China or India, in which case you’d still have to wait for priority dates to be current, you would be eligible to apply for adjustment of status (green card) immediately without any lag in priority dates.

As a primer, NIW applicants must have a master’s or higher degree. The landmark immigration case that discusses the standards for NIWs is Matter of New York State Department of Transportation, 22 I&N Dec. 215 (Comm.1998). This case held that the qualifying applicant must show the following elements in his or her I-140 NIW petition: First, it must be shown that the alien seeks employment in an area of substantial intrinsic merit. Next, it must be shown that the proposed benefit will be national in scope. Finally, the petitioner seeking the waiver must establish that the alien will serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U. S. worker having the same minimum qualifications.

Our office prepared a 19-page brief for our client’s NIW filing. Our client also obtained 7 letters of recommendation from his colleagues and internationally-recognized scientists. Our office also included his publication records, presentation records, and conference materials in the NIW application. We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. His NIW application contained 41 exhibits.

Our office filed his I-140(NIW) petition to the USCIS Nebraska Service Center on July 18, 2013.  Eventually, on October 24, 2013, the USCIS Nebraska Service Center approved our client’s I-140 petition.

Once the I-140 petition was approved, our client retained our office again for his I-485 adjustment of status application. Our office filed an I-485 adjustment of status application for our client on February 10, 2014. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices and fingerprint appointment came on time.

Eventually, on April 28, 2014, the USCIS Nebraska Service Center approved our client’s adjustment of status application. Now, he finally is a green card holder.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: I-485 (National Interest Waiver)

CLIENT: Korean

LOCATION: Santa Clara, California

Our client contacted us in June 2013 about the possibility of doing a National Interest Waiver application for him. He is a post-doctorate researcher and scientist in the field of Aerospace Engineering and Science, and was working as a research fellow for NASA at the time of his filing.

Our client is an extraordinary researcher and engineer in the field of Aerospace Engineering Research; specifically, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and flow control.

His significant contributions have placed him at the pinnacle of the field of Aerospace engineering. Our client’s expertise is in the development of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) which meets the contemporary requirements for not only conventional development but also revolutionary aircraft design. He has been helping a U.S. aircraft company investigate the feasibility of their designs under consideration by performing very complex CFD analysis and suggesting alternative optimal new configurations.

Upon review of his credentials and qualifications, our office determined that he was qualified for the National Interest Waiver (NIW) category. Being qualified for the NIW is beneficial since you would not need an employer nor family member to petition you for green card purposes. You’d be eligible for a self-petition and unless you are from China or India, in which case you’d still have to wait for priority dates to be current, you would be eligible to apply for adjustment of status (green card) immediately without any lag in priority dates.

As a primer, NIW applicants must have a master’s or higher degree. The landmark immigration case that discusses the standards for NIWs is Matter of New York State Department of Transportation, 22 I&N Dec. 215 (Comm.1998). This case held that the qualifying applicant must show the following elements in his or her I-140 NIW petition: First, it must be shown that the alien seeks employment in an area of substantial intrinsic merit. Next, it must be shown that the proposed benefit will be national in scope. Finally, the petitioner seeking the waiver must establish that the alien will serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U. S. worker having the same minimum qualifications.

Our office prepared a 19-page brief for our client’s NIW filing. Our client also obtained 9 letters of recommendation from his colleagues and internationally-recognized scientists. Our office also included his publication records, presentation records, and conference materials in the NIW application. We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. His NIW application contained 45 exhibits. Our office filed his I-140(NIW) petition at the USCIS Nebraska Service Center on July 29, 2013 along with his I-485 adjustment of status application.

However, on September 16, 2013, the USCIS issued a Request for Evidence for his I-140 petition. In response to the RFE request, our office prepared a brief which included notes from scientists in the field regarding updates of his work and the importance of his past work in physics-based turbulence model and computational fluid dynamics research.  We also emphasized our client’s past accomplishments and the benefits of his work. Our Response to RFE was filed on November 13, 2013. Eventually, on December 6, 2013, the USCIS Nebraska Service Center approved our client’s I-140 petition.

When we filed our client’s I-140 (NIW) application, we concurrently filed an I-485 adjustment of status application for our client. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices and fingerprint appointment came on time. While our client was waiting for the adjudication of his I-140, our client received his work permit and travel permit from the USCIS.

Eventually, on March 13, 2014, the USCIS Nebraska Service Center approved our client’s adjustment of status application. He is now a green card holder.

{ 0 comments }

 CASE: I-485 based on Approved I-140 (EB-2)

 APPLICANT: Filipino

 LOCATION: Erie, PA

Our client is a family physician from the Philippines, who is currently working at a hospital which was willing to petition him for a second-preference petition (I-140).  Our client has an M.D. degree and is licensed physician in the state of Pennsylvania. He has maintained his status as an H-1B visa holder in the United States.  After talking to our client, our firm concluded that his potential employer can petition him as a Family Medicine Physician. Based on our client’s educational, professional and working background, our office determined that he is clearly eligible for an EB-2 classification for his I-140 petition.

Prior to filing PERM, our firm prepared the prevailing wage request, job order, advertisements, internal job posting, recruitment report, and all other steps which are important pre-PERM filing. Take note that the PERM application could be filed at least 60 days from the job posting date or 30 days from the last ad. Within a week from our retention, the prevailing wage request was filed.  After we obtained the foreign degree evaluation report, our office filed the job order on November 16, 2011.  On May 10, 2012, we promptly filed PERM.  Eventually, on July 17, 2012, a little after two months from filing, the PERM Labor Certification was approved – an EB2 position for the Filipino beneficiary.

We then proceeded with the I-140 Petition filing.  We submitted the “ability to pay” letter for the I-140 petition application.  We included the job offer letter, state physician license, our client’s M.D. degree, and other necessary supporting documents.

The I-140 Petition was filed on September 11, 2012 via regular processing service.  On May 3, 2013, the I-140 EB2 Petition for our Filipino client was approved.

Once the I-140 petition was approved, our client retained our office again for his I-485 adjustment of status application. Our office filed an I-485 adjustment of status application for our client on October 18, 2013. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices and fingerprint appointment came on time.

Eventually, on March 3, 2014, the USCIS Texas Service Center approved our client’s adjustment of status application. He is now a green card holder.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: I-485 (National Interest Waiver)

CLIENT: Korean

LOCATION: Cleveland, Ohio

Our client contacted us in April 2012 regarding the possibility of doing a National Interest Waiver self-petition for him. He is a post-doctorate researcher and scientist in the field of Material Science / Engineering, and is currently working as a post-doctorate researcher in an academic institution in Cleveland, Ohio.

His significant contributions have placed him at the pinnacle of the field of material science and engineering. He is a leading scientist with an excellent reputation in alloy design, especially in titanium alloys which are promising structural and functional materials for the next generation. Our client successfully brazed Ti alloys which are mostly used in aerospace and chemical applications. Successfully joining of titanium alloys is of great importance to national defense. He also developed very low-melting Ti-based filler alloys for Ti alloys. Lower brazing temperature would ensure lower risk of damaging aerospace components during processing.

Upon review of his credentials and qualifications, our office determined that he was qualified for the National Interest Waiver (NIW) category. Being qualified for NIW is beneficial since you would not need an employer nor family member to petition for you for green card purposes. You’d be eligible for a self-petition and unless you are from China or India, in which case you’d still have to wait for priority dates to be current, you would be eligible to apply for adjustment of status (green card) immediately without any lag in priority dates.

As a primer, NIW applicants must have a master’s or higher degree. The landmark immigration case that discusses the standards for NIWs is Matter of New York State Department of Transportation, 22 I&N Dec. 215 (Comm.1998). This case held that the qualifying applicant must show the following elements in his or her I-140 NIW petition: First, it must be shown that the alien seeks employment in an area of substantial intrinsic merit. Next, it must be shown that the proposed benefit will be national in scope. Finally, the petitioner seeking the waiver must establish that the alien will serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U. S. worker having the same minimum qualifications.

Our office prepared a 23-page brief for our client’s NIW filing. Our client also obtained 9 letters of recommendation from his colleagues and internationally-recognized scientists. Our office also included his publication records, patents, presentation records, and conference materials in the NIW application. We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. His NIW application contained 58 exhibits.

Our office filed his I-140(NIW) petition to the USCIS Texas Service Center on November 8, 2012. Eventually, on November 14, 2013, the USCIS Nebraska Service Center approved our client’s I-140 petition.

While his I-140 was pending, we filed an I-485 adjustment of status application for our client on November 6, 2013. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices and fingerprint appointment came on time.

Eventually, on February 21, 2014, the USCIS Nebraska Service Center approved our client’s adjustment of status application. Now, our client is a green card holder.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: H-1B Change of Employer (Cap Exempt to Non Cap Exempt)

PETITIONER: Industrial Material Company

BENEFICIARY: Chinese Industrial Material Research Scientist

LOCATION: Ohio

Our client is an industrial material company focused on the production and commercialization of high-performance / non-immunogenic biomaterials for use in the medial and consumer healthcare arenas. They are located in Wooster, Ohio. They contacted our office in early January 2014 to seek legal assistance from our office for their foreign employee. The beneficiary is from China and he obtained his Master’s degree in Plant Pathology in the United States. The proffered position for the Beneficiary is an industrial material research scientist which qualifies as a specialty occupation. This proffered position is clearly a “specialty occupation” because the minimum requirement for this position is a Bachelor’s Degree in Science/Engineering or its equivalent.

The foreign beneficiary in this case already had his H-1B visa from his previous employer.  However, his H-1B visa was not yet expired, and he wanted to extend his H-1B status on a change of employer basis. His H-1B at that time was with his first petitioner, which was a cap-exempt organization – a university.

There were articles online noting that when a change of employer is done from a cap-exempt organization to a non cap-exempt organization, that the change of employer may be subject to the cap. But there was no specific law on that. We simply based the application on the fact that it was a change of employer, and thus the petition should be exempted from the annual cap of the H-1B.

Once retained, our office filed the H-1B visa petition with various supporting documents on January 29, 2014 via regular processing.  Since this petition was based on a change of employer, we argued that this petition was exempt from the annual cap of the H-1B.  Thus, we could file prior to April 1.

There were no Requests for Evidence during the processing of the H-1B.  Our client did not even want to do premium processing. But in approximately two weeks, our client’s H-1B Petition was approved on February 14, 2014.  Now the Beneficiary can work for his Petitioner-Employer as an H-1B visa holder and he can work there for the next three years.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: H-1B Change of Employer

PETITIONER: Fashion Retailer Company

BENEFICIARY: Filipina Textile Product Designer

LOCATION: New York, NY

Our client is a nationwide fashion retailer headquartered in New York City. They contacted our office in late September 2013 to seek assistance from our office for their foreign employee. The beneficiary is from the Philippines and she obtained her Bachelor’s degree in fashion design and marketing. The proffered position for the Beneficiary is textile product developer/designer which we argued qualifies as a specialty occupation

The foreign beneficiary in this case already had her H-1B from her previous employer which was in a similar industry.  Her H-1B status was not yet expired, and she wanted to extend her H-1B status on a change of employer basis.

After retention, our office promptly filed the H-1B visa petition with various supporting documents on November 5, 2013 via regular processing.  Since this petition was based on a change of employer, this petition was exempt from the annual cap of the H-1B.  Thus, we could file prior to April 1, 2014.  There were no Requests for Evidence during the processing of the H-1B.  Eventually, our client’s H-1B Petition was approved on February 13, 2014.  Now the Beneficiary can work for her Petitioner-Employer as an H-1B visa holder and she can work there for the next three years.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: H1B Extension

PETITIONER: Pump Manufacturing Company

BENEFICIARY: Kenyan Sales Manager

LOCATION: West Virginia

Our client is a Sales Manager from Kenya who currently works at a hydraulic pumps and motors manufacturing company in West Virginia on a valid H-1B visa. His H-1B status was about to expire in September 2013.  Our client sought legal assistance from us for his H-1B 3-year extension and retained our office on September 18, 2013.

Once we were retained, our office prepared her H-1B extension application.  The Labor Condition Application was filed and approved and eventually our office filed the H-1B extension application on September 26, 2013 to the USCIS Vermont Service Center. There was no Request for Evidence with the filing and the Petitioner did not opt for premium processing. The case was approved on February 4, 2014. The H-1B is good from October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2016.

{ 0 comments }