slide
Success Stories
If you need help in any aspect of immigration law, feel free to contact our office. We invite you to view our success stories.
slide
From Our Clients
Please read our compiled reviews from the internet, from Google to AVVO, on what our clients have said about our firm.
slide
Marriage
One of the fastest and most common immigration cases are those based on marriage to a US Citizen.
slide
Family and Relative Immigration
From immigration of children, parents, siblings, to cases involving 245(i), CSPA, and the death of a petitioner, we are here to help.
slide
H-1B
H-1B petitions for employment in specialty occupations, from computer analysts, engineers, nurse managers, accountants, architects, doctors, feel free to contact us.
slide
Asylum
Past persecution or fear of future persecution on account of politics, race, religion, social group, or nationality. Let us guide you in the asylum application process.
  • CONTACT US

    FREE CONSULTATIONS ............. 5005 Rockside Rd. Ste. 600 Cleveland Ohio 44131 ............. PH: (216) 573-3712 .................... FAX: (888) 513-6917
  • CLIENTS’ CHOICE AWARD

    Juan Paolo Pasia SarmientoClients’ ChoiceAward 2019
    Sung Hee YuClients’ ChoiceAward 2018
  • Success Stories

  • CASE: Termination of Removal Proceedings with an Approved I-130 Petition / I-485 under the INA 245(i) provision
    CLIENT: St. Lucian
    LOCATION: New York, NY

    Our client is from St. Lucia who came to the U.S. on a B-2 visitors visa in December 2003. Since that time, she never left the United States.  Because of her overstay, removal proceedings was initiated against her in September 2010.

    In May 1986, our client’s aunt filed an I-130 (fourth preference) petition for her father.  This I-130 petition was approved in August 1986.  At the time the I-130 Petition was approved, our client was a minor and was a derivative beneficiary. Later, our client’s father filed an I-130 petition on behalf of our client in February 1998.  This Petition was approved in November of that year.

    Our client contacted us around December of 2010 for consultation and sought legal assistance for her removal proceedings. After the consultation, we determined that she is eligible for adjustment of status under INA 245(i). Our client retained us on January 13, 2011.

    Section 245(i) of the INA allows certain foreign nationals to become permanent residents of the United States despite entering without inspection (EWI) or overstaying (if beneficiary of petitions filed not by an immediate relative). Immigrants are barred from adjusting their status if they entered the United States without first being inspected and admitted by a Customs and Border Patrol officer and if they have either failed to maintain lawful status or been unlawfully employed in the country, with certain exceptions. Section 245(i) was first added to law in 1994 to allow certain people who otherwise would not be eligible to adjust their status to be able to do so upon payment of a $1,000 fine.

    Four years later, on January 14, 1998, Congress phased Section 245(i) out of law. Immigrants and their families who had already begun the process of changing their status under Section 245(i) by January 14, 1998 were grandfathered into the section’s benefits. However, this left thousands of otherwise qualified persons who had not begun the process unable to adjust status in the United States. They could not return to their countries to begin the legal process of obtaining their permanent residency in the United States also without being subject to either a three- or a 10-year bar upon returning to the United States.

    On December 21, 2000, Congress extended the qualifying date for Section 245(i) benefits to April 30, 2001. This law allowed immigrants who had labor certifications or visa petitions filed on their behalf between 1998 and April 30, 2001, to qualify for adjustment of status. Those who were beneficiaries of petitions filed prior to January 14, 1998 could still adjust despite an EWI record, and those people do not have to meet the December 2000 physical presence requirement.

    Our client was the beneficiary of her father’s petition in February 1998, which is current, but this by itself would not have allowed her to adjust status since this was filed after January 1998 and because she came in 2003, thus not meeting the December 21, 2000 physical presence requirement. However, she was also the beneficiary of a petition filed before January 14, 1998, that of her aunt’s petition for her father. So it was two petitions that saved her case, one for 245i, and the other for adjustment eligibility.

    Once retained, our office promptly filed a Motion to Change Venue from Buffalo to New York.  This was granted and on April 1, 2011, our office filed a request to join in a Motion to Terminate proceedings with an attached I-485 application and its supporting documents. The DHS counsel in New York agreed to terminate our client’s proceedings. Ultimately, the Immigration Judge granted the Motion to Terminate without prejudice on August 17, 2011.

    Once her case was terminated, the USCIS New York scheduled an I-485 interview for our client. Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our client through conference call. On May 1, 2012, our client was interviewed at the New York City USCIS office. Attorney JP Sarmiento accompanied her at the interview as well. Due to the complexity of the case, we made sure the officer was clear about our client’s 245i eligibility. On May 30, 2012, our client’s I-485 application was approved.  She finally became a green card holder.

    FREE CONSULTATIONS

    If you have any questions, please fill out the free consultation form below, and we will respond as soon as possible privately. 

      captcha

      For 245i success stories, please click here.

      For termination success stories, please click here.

      For other success stories, please click here.

      Also feel free to contact us anytime for free consultations.

      { 0 comments }

      On August 2, 2011, the U.S. Embassy in Manila established its Visa Reissuance Program (VRP) to expedite tourist visa renewals for those who previously have been issued multiple entry visas to the United States valid for five years or longer.

      Under this program, a Philippine citizen holding a valid tourist visa can apply for re-issuance within 12 months of its expiration date. Visa reissuance applicants will be given a priority appointment date. They only need to appear at the Consular Section of the Embassy at the designated appointment time to submit a valid passport and application confirmation page, and to have their fingerprints digitally scanned. No interview will normally be needed. The applicants can expect to receive their passports with the new U.S. visa within a week of application.

      Below are the requirements to be eligible for the visa reissuance program:

      • Philippine passport holder
      • Previously been issued a B1/B2 visa good for five or ten years
      • Visa is still valid or has expired within the last twelve months
      • In possession of all passports covering the entire period of time since that most recent full-validity visa
      • Have not been refused a U.S. visa in the last twelve months
      • Visa is not annotated “clearance received”
      • Have not stayed in the U.S. longer than 6 months straight (even if the CIS approved an extension)
      • Have not ever been arrested or convicted for any offense or crime, even if subject of a pardon
      • Can provide the visa control number from the visa

      If you have any questions, please fill out the free consultation form below, and we will respond as soon as possible privately. 

        captcha

        { 6 comments }

        CASE: Change of Status from J-1 to B-2 Visitor
        NATIONALITY: Filipino (Philippines)
        LOCATION: Ohio

        Our client is a Filipino national who came to the U.S. on a J-1 Visa. She consulted with our firm a few weeks before the expiration of her J-1 status. She wanted to continue to stay in the United States for a few more months to visit her relatives and see what her options were. We explained to her that CIS has been more stringent on Visitor status applications. We also explained that a Change of Status from a J-1 is even harder than an Visitor extension application. Upon retention, we asked her to prepare a statement on her plans after the expiration of her J-1 program. We asked her to provide as much detail as possible as we reviewed her drafts several times. We made sure all addresses, contact information, and dates on her statements were complete and accurate. We made sure all her plans were supported by corroborating evidence as exhibits to the application to avoid a possible Request for Evidence by the CIS. Letters from family and friends all over the country were obtained, as well as financial and employment documents from the Philippines. We filed the Application and in a few weeks, her change of status to B-2 visitor was approved with no Requests for Evidence.

        FREE CONSULTATIONS

        If you have any questions, please fill out the free consultation form below, and we will respond as soon as possible privately. 

          captcha

          { 0 comments }