CASE: J-1 Waiver (No Objection Statement)

NATIONALITY: Philippines

LOCATION: Sacramento, CA

Our client came from the Philippines on a J-1 in August 2017 to work as a teacher. Based on her DS-2019, she was subject to the two-year foreign residency requirement. 

In July 2019, she got married to her U.S. citizen husband and later on consulted with our firm for her J-1 visa waiver prior to applying for adjustment of status. If someone is subject to the two-year foreign residency requirement, he or she cannot get a green card in the United States until he or she fulfills the two-year requirement or obtains a waiver.

On October 16, 2019, the J-1 Waiver Application (Form DS-3035) was filed to the Department of State.  On November 26, 2019, our office sent our client’s NOS request to the EVP Waiver Review Committee in Manila, Philippines.  The Waiver Review Committee approved of the request and forwarded the materials and favorable recommendation to the Philippine Embassy in D.C. who eventually issued a No Objection Statement.

On May 5, 2020, the Waiver Review Division issued a favorable recommendation based on the No Objection statement.  Eventually, on May 18, 2020, the USCIS issued an I-612 approval notice for the waiver. Now, our client can file for her adjustment status application along with her U.S. Citizen husband’s I-130 petition for her.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: J-1 Waiver (No Objection Statement)

NATIONALITY: Philippines

LOCATION: Sacramento, California

Our client came from the Philippines on a J-1 in August 2016 to work as a teacher. Based on his DS-2019, he was subject to the two-year foreign residency requirement. Later, his employer wanted to sponsor his green card and he consulted with our firm for his J-1 visa waiver prior to applying for adjustment of status. If someone is subject to the two-year foreign residency requirement, he or she cannot get a green card in the United States until he or she fulfills the requirement or obtains a waiver.

Our office told our client that he can apply for a waiver under the No Objection Statement category based on the fact that he has a U.S. citizen son. Upon retention, our office promptly prepared a waiver request through a No Objection Statement (NOS) from the Philippine Embassy in the United States and eventually the EVP in the Philippines.

On September 30, 2019, the J-1 Waiver Application (Form DS-3035) was filed to the Department of State.  We also prepared the application packet to the EVP Philippines, which require several distinct documents, including apostilled affidavits and forms. On December 19, 2019, our office sent our client’s materials to the Waiver Review Committee in Manila, Philippines.  They approved the application and forwarded the materials and favorable recommendation to the Philippine Embassy in D.C. who eventually issued a No Objection Statement.

On May 5, 2020, the Waiver Review Division issued a favorable recommendation based on the No Objection statement.  Eventually, on May 12, 2020, the USCIS issued an I-612 approval notice for the waiver.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: I-130 and Consular Processing (Immigrant Visa)

 CLIENT: US Citizen Petitioner Father; Filipino Beneficiary Children in the Philippines

 LOCATION: Petitioner: Daly City, CA; Beneficiary: Manila, Philippines

 I-130 FILED: June 8, 2018

 I-130 APPROVED: February 19, 2019

 IV APPROVED: February 10, 2020

Our client retained us to bring his children over from the Philippines. He was born and raised in the Philippines, but was naturalized in the United States.

On June 8, 2018, our firm filed the I-130 Petitions to the CIS. There were no Requests for Evidence throughout the pendency of the petition. On February 19, 2019, the I-130 Petitions were approved. We then started the immigrant visa processing phase of trying to get his children over to the United States.

On September 17, 2019, we filed the immigrant visa packets to the National Visa Center who in turn forwarded our client’s materials to the U.S. Embassy in Manila, Philippines. An interview notice was set for our client’s children at the U.S. Embassy in Manila, and we prepared them for their interview. On February 10, 2020, the U.S. Embassy in Manila, Philippines approved and issued their immigrant visas.

With the approved immigrant visas, our client’s children can come to the United States immediately, and they will get their green cards within two months of entry.

{ 0 comments }

CASE:  I-751 / Removal Proceedings

APPLICANT: Filipina

LOCATION: Solon, OH

Our client contacted our office in July 2018 regarding her removal proceedings representation and I-751 application.

She is from the Philippines and she married a U.S. citizen in June 2014. Through her marriage, she obtained a 2-year conditional green card in July 2015.  Her conditional residency terminated in July 2017.

To comply with immigration requirements, our client and her husband had to file an I-751 Joint Petition to Remove Conditions. They filed the I-751 application first; however, her husband filed a divorce against her while the application was pending.  Our client’s initial I-751 application was thus denied. Later on, our client was placed into removal proceedings.

Once retained, our office prepared an I-751 application for our client with other supplemental exhibits including a detailed explanatory brief. On December 19, 2018, our office filed an I-751 application to the USCIS with multiple affidavits from her friends and family members, joint bank statements, utility bills, insurance policies, and photos of our client and her husband to demonstrate the bona fideness of their marriage. Once the application was filed, the fingerprint notice was issued two weeks later.

Our client had to appear for her Master Calendar hearing at the Cleveland Immigration Court on December 17, 2019. Attorney Sung Hee (Glen) Yu represented our client at her initial Master Calendar Hearing and informed the court that our office filed a new I-751 application to the USCIS.  

In December 2019, the USCIS scheduled an interview for our client. On January 28, 2020, our client was requested to appear for the interview at the USCIS Cleveland Field Office.  Prior to the interview, our office prepared her thoroughly at our office and also accompanied them at the interview as well. Eventually, on April 22, 2020, the USCIS approved our client’s I-751 application and our client received her 10-year green card which removed the conditions. Now, our office will file the Motion to Terminate proceedings to the Cleveland Immigration Court to terminate her removal proceedings. 

{ 0 comments }

CASE: J-2 Waiver of Two-Year Foreign Residency Requirement / Over 21-year-old dependent child

NATIONALITY: Chinese

LOCATION: San Francisco, CA

Our client was a citizen of China who came to the U.S. on a J-2 Visa in February 2002.  She came with her father who came on a J-1 Visa for her research work in the United States. Both were subject to the two-year foreign residency requirement, meaning they had to go back to their home country for two-years before they can apply for permanent residency or some non-immigrant visa such as the H, L, and O visas.

She turned 21 in April 2012.  She wanted to file her I-485 adjustment of status application as a derivative applicant of her husband’s case. However, because of her two-year foreign residency requirement, our client cannot adjust her status in the United States without the fulfillment of requirement or the waiver. 

Although J-2 dependents cannot independently apply for a waiver, in cases where a J-2 child reaches 21, the Waiver Review Division may consider requests for waivers on behalf of the J-2 dependent.  The Department of State’s policy allows for that process in instances where the J-2 dependent obtains a divorce form the J-1 principal, the J-1 principal dies, or in cases where the J-2 dependent turns 21, which is our client’s case. In fact, our client turned 21 in April 2012.

Our firm was retained to do her J-2 waiver, and on February 7, 2020, the J-2 Waiver application (Form DS-3035 and supporting documents) was filed to the Department of State. We also sent a request to the DOS to be an interested government agency and recommend this waiver based on the fact that our client reached the age of 21 and was not a dependent of a J-1 visa holder anymore.  Eventually, on April 2, 2020, the DOS recommended to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) that our client be granted a waiver.  On April 24, 2020, the USCIS issued an I-612 approval notice for our client’s waiver request.

{ 0 comments }

CASE:   J-1 Waiver (No Objection Statement)

APPLICANT / BENEFICIARY: Filipina

LOCATION: Corona, California

Our client came to the United States from the Philippines in August 2010 on a C-1 visa (Crewman). She remained in the United States after her entry in August 2010. She married her U.S. citizen husband in February 2017. She retained our office on June 20, 2017 for the I-130 and I-601A waiver filing. We filed an I-130 petition for her in July 2017. This I-130 petition was approved in February 2018. With our office’s legal assistance, she also obtained her I-601A Provisional Waiver on March 17, 2020. 

However, our client cannot file for adjustment of status application due to her ground of inadmissibility (crewman entry and overstay). She needs a waiver of inadmissibility to become a green card holder. Despite she has her I-601A waiver, she also needs to get a J-1 waiver for her previous J-1 program which took place prior to her C-1 visa entry. 

Upon retention, our office promptly prepared a waiver request through a No Objection Statement (NOS) from the Philippine Embassy in the United States and eventually the EVP in the Philippines.

On June 11, 2019, the J-1 Waiver Application (Form DS-3035) was filed to the Department of State.  On September 16, 2019, our office sent our client’s materials to the Waiver Review Committee in Manila, Philippines.  Then, the Waiver Review Committee forwarded the materials and favorable recommendation to the Philippine Embassy in D.C. who eventually issued a No Objection Statement.

On March 13, 2020, the Waiver Review Division issued a favorable recommendation based on the No Objection statement.  Eventually, on April 3, 2020, the USCIS issued an I-612 approval notice for the waiver. Now, our client can file for her immigrant visa filing with her waivers. 

{ 0 comments }

CASE: I-140 / National Interest Waiver

CLIENT: Korean

LOCATION: San Francisco, CA

Our client contacted us about the possibility of doing a National Interest Waiver self-petition. He is a researcher from South Korea and he is an exceptional researcher and scientist in the field of Biomedical Engineering research. 

Our client’s significant contributions have placed him at the pinnacle of his field. His field of research primarily concerns biomedical materials design and development, and its in-depth characterizations. Moreover, he has been working lately on other subject including bio-inspired materials design (so-called bio-mimetics).  Throughout his research career, our client has made important contributions to the field of biomedical engineering and his research involves the study of structural biological materials (bone) and the development of bioinspired designs based on these structures (biodegradable metal / ceramic composite scaffold, 3D printing), which so far has resulted in scaffolds and composites that have diverse applications from bone implants to light weight aerospace structures. Because of his innovative research, our client’s research works were highly evaluated by the reviewers of various journals and by colleagues and experts in the field.

Upon review of his credentials and qualifications, our office determined that he was definitely qualified for the National Interest Waiver (NIW) category. Being qualified for NIW is beneficial since you would not need an employer nor family member to petition for you for green card purposes. You’d be eligible for a self-petition and unless you are from China or India, in which case you’d still have to wait for priority dates to be current, you would be eligible to apply for adjustment of status (green card) immediately without any lag in priority dates.

As a primer, NIW applicants must have a master’s or higher degree. While we prepared his case, the AAO set the new standards for NIW cases in Matter of Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016). Under the new standard, the petitioner must demonstrate that the foreign national’s proposed endeavor has both substantial merit and national importance. Next, it must be shown that he or she is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor. Finally, the petitioner seeking the waiver needs to demonstrate that, on balance, it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements. Id. 

Our office prepared a 21-page brief for our client’s NIW filing. Our client also obtained 6 letters of recommendation from his colleagues and internationally-recognized researchers. Our office also included his publication records, presentation records, and conference materials in the NIW application. We demonstrated that our client is one of the few elite researchers who have made significant and substantial contributions to his field of endeavor, that he is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor, and it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the requirements of a job offer and thus of a labor certification for our client. 

Our office filed his I-140(NIW) petition to the USCIS Nebraska Service Center on February 7, 2019. However, on November 26, 2019, the USCIS Nebraska Service Center issued Request for Evidence (RFE) for our client and surprisingly argued that our client has not met all of three prongs of Dhanasar. Our client and our office prepared extensive RFE response and filed Response to RFE to the USCIS on February 18, 2020. 

Eventually, on March 25, 2020, the USCIS approved his I-140 petition. When we filed his I-140, he concurrently filed his I-485 adjustment of status application. His adjustment of status application will be approved soon as well.

{ 0 comments }

CASE:   I-601A Hardship Waiver of Inadmissibility

APPLICANT / BENEFICIARY: Filipina

LOCATION: Corona, California

Our client came to the United States from the Philippines in August 2010 on a C-1 visa (Crewman). She remained in the United States after her entry in August 2010. She married her U.S. citizen husband in February 2017. She retained our office on June 20, 2017 for the I-130 and I-601A waiver filing. We filed an I-130 petition for her in July 2017. This I-130 petition was approved in February 2018.

Our client cannot file for adjustment of status due to her ground of inadmissibility (crewman entry and overstay). She needs a waiver of inadmissibility to become a green card holder.

Under current law, immediate relatives of U.S. citizens who are not eligible to adjust status in the United States must travel abroad and obtain an immigrant visa. Individuals who have accrued more than 180 days of unlawful presence while in the United States must obtain a waiver of inadmissibility to overcome the unlawful presence bars under section 212(a)(9)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act before they can return to the United States.

In 2013, the USCIS announced of new policy called the provisional unlawful presence waiver. Beginning March 4, 2013, certain immigrant visa applicants who are spouses, children and parents of U.S. citizens (immediate relatives) can apply for provisional unlawful presence waivers before they leave the United States. The provisional unlawful presence waiver process allows individuals, who only need a waiver of inadmissibility for unlawful presence, to apply for a waiver in the United States.

The new process is expected to shorten the time U.S. citizens are separated from their immediate relatives while those family members are obtaining immigrant visas to become lawful permanent residents of the United States.

INA § 212(i) provides for a discretionary waiver of the entry without inspection inadmissibility ground. To qualify for the waiver, the alien must establish that his or her US Citizen spouse would suffer extreme hardship if the alien were denied admission. INA § 212(i)(1). In addition to the equities presented, the USCIS may consider the nature of the inadmissibility ground.

There is a seminal BIA case that deals with this waiver.  In Matter of Cervantes, 22 I & N Dec. 560 (BIA 1999), the BIA identified the factors to be considered in determining whether a qualifying relative would suffer extreme hardship if the alien were denied admission.  Those factors include: the presence of LPR or USC family ties both within and outside the United States; the conditions in the country to which the qualifying relative would relocate and the extent of the qualifying relative’s ties to that country; the financial impact of departure from the United States; and significant conditions of health, particularly when tied to the unavailability of suitable medical care in the country to which the qualifying relative would relocate.

Our client’s I-601A application had a good chance since our client’s U.S. Citizen husband suffers from a great degree of hardship. We argued that if she was removed from the United States, extreme hardship to her husband is clearly foreseeable and evident. He would not be able to take care of his own needs and the bulk of their family chores, most importantly taking care of their child. Also, it would be extremely difficult for him to get the same level of economic stability in the Philippines in case he joins our client there.

In our brief, we also argued that our client and her husband have maintained strong family ties in the United States, that her husband will have difficulty in finding the same level of employment in the Philippines, and that he will face extreme emotional difficulties if she is removed.

On February 12, 2019, we filed the I-601A waiver application which included the brief in support, and documents that demonstrated hardship to her husband if our client is removed from the United States. Eventually, her I-601A waiver was approved on March 17, 2020. Now, she can file packet 3 and 4 here in the United States, and would go to the Philippines shortly to get her immigrant visa.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: J-2 Waiver of Two-Year Foreign Residency Requirement / Over 21-year-old dependent child

NATIONALITY: Korean

LOCATION: Stanford, CA

Our client was a citizen of South Korea who came to the U.S. on a J-2 Visa in July 2001.  He came with his mother who came on a J-1 Visa for her medical residency program in the United States. Both were subject to the two-year foreign residency requirement, meaning they had to go back to their home country for two-years before they can apply for permanent residency or some non-immigrant visa such as the H, L, and O visas.

He turned 21 in September 2017.  He plans to file his adjustment of status with NIW petition.  However, because of his two-year foreign residency requirement, our client cannot change his status in the United States without the fulfillment of requirement or the waiver. 

Although J-2 dependents cannot independently apply for a waiver, in cases where a J-2 child reaches 21, the Waiver Review Division may consider requests for waivers on behalf of the J-2 dependent.  The Department of State’s policy allows for that process in instances where the J-2 dependent obtains a divorce form the J-1 principal, the J-1 principal dies, or in cases where the J-2 dependent turns 21, which is our client’s case. In fact, our client turned 21 in September 2017.

Our firm was retained to do his J-2 waiver, and on November 21, 2019, the J-2 Waiver application (Form DS-3035 and supporting documents) was filed to the Department of State. We also sent a request to the DOS to be an interested government agency and recommend this waiver based on the fact that our client reached the age of 21 and was not a dependent of a J-1 visa holder anymore.  Eventually, on January 28, 2020, the DOS recommended to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) that our client be granted a waiver. On February 18, 2020, the USCIS issued an I-612 approval notice for our client’s waiver request.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: Marriage-Based Adjustment of Status

CLIENT: Filipina

LOCATION: Costa Mesa, CA

Our client came to the United States from the Philippines with a B-2 visitor’s visa in November 2016. Since then, she has remained in the United States. She married a U.S. Citizen in February 2019 and retained our office on March 15, 2019 for her green card application.  Our firm prepared and filed the I-130 Petition and I-485 Adjustment of Status Application on May 3, 2019. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices, fingerprint appointment, and work permits all came on time. Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our clients via conference calls. On February 19, 2020, our client was interviewed at the Santa Ana, California USCIS office. Eventually, on the same day of the interview, her green card application was approved.

{ 0 comments }