CASE: I-140 (Skilled Worker) / Schedule A
EMPLOYER: Nursing / Rehabilitation Center
BENEFICIARY: Nepalese
LOCATION: Houston, TX
Our client’s beneficiary is a registered nurse from Nepal and licensed in the state of Texas. She came to the United States on a valid visa and she is currently working in the United States with her TPS (Temporary Protected Status). Her current employer was willing to petition her for a third-preference employment immigrant visa petition (I-140).
Since she is a registered nurse, she is eligible for “Schedule A” classification. The Department of Labor (DOL) maintains a schedule of occupations in its regulations, Schedule A included, for which the individual permanent labor certification procedure is not required. The schedule of pre-certified occupations is referred to as Schedule A, and is included in DOL regulations at 20 CFR 656.10. Based on an occupation’s inclusion on Schedule A, an employer may file an immigrant visa petition (I-140) directly with the (USCIS) without first going to the DOL for a labor certification. Usually, prior to filing I-140 petitions (EB-2 or EB-3 category), the employer must file a Labor Certification to the Department of Labor. However, for Schedule A cases, the employer does not have to go through the labor certification process. The position of Professional Nurses is included in Schedule A.
Our client has an Associate of nursing degree and has worked for the sponsor-employer. Our firm told her that her employer can petition her as a Registered Nurse under the schedule A category. Our office was retained on June 15, 2016 and started on her Prevailing Wage Request.
We filed the I-140 application on January 14, 2019 via premium processing. We included the job offer letter, the notice of filing, and other necessary supporting documents. However, on January 23, 2019, the USCIS issued Request for Evidence and asked our client to submit the copy of petitioner’s most recent tax return. Our office filed the response to USCIS on January 25, 2019. Eventually, on February 7, 2019, the I-140 was approved.
{ 0 comments }
CASE: J-2 Waiver of Two-Year Foreign Residency Requirement / Over 21-year-old dependent child
NATIONALITY: Nepalese
LOCATION: Chicago, IL
Our client is a citizen of Nepal who came to the U.S. on a J-2 Visa in July 2002. She came with her father who came on a J-1 Visa for her research program in the United States. Both were subject to the two-year foreign residency requirement, meaning they had to go back to their home country for two-years before they can apply for permanent residency or some non-immigrant visa such as the H, L, and O visas.
She turned 21 in August 2011. She would like to get a waiver because she has a prospective employer who will file the H-1B petition for her next year. However, because of her two-year foreign residency requirement, our client cannot change her status in the United States without the fulfillment of requirement or the waiver.
Although J-2 dependents cannot independently apply for a waiver, in cases where a J-2 child reaches 21, the Waiver Review Division may consider requests for waivers on behalf of the J-2 dependent. The Department of State’s policy allows for that process in instances where the J-2 dependent obtains a divorce form the J-1 principal, the J-1 principal dies, or in cases where the J-2 dependent turns 21, which is our client’s case. In fact, our client turned 21 in August 2011.
Our firm was retained to do her J-2 waiver, and on November 27, 2018, the J-2 Waiver application (Form DS-3035 and supporting documents) was filed to the Department of State. We also sent a request to the DOS to be an interested government agency and recommend this waiver based on the fact that our client reached the age of 21 and was not a dependent of a J-1 visa holder anymore. Eventually, on December 13, 2018, the DOS recommended to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) that our client be granted a waiver. On January 25, 2019, the USCIS issued an I-612 approval notice for our client’s waiver request.
{ 0 comments }
CASE: Marriage-Based Adjustment of Status
NATIONALITY: Nepalese
LOCATION: Toledo, OH
Our client is from Nepal who came to the U.S. on an F-1 student visa to pursue his undergraduate degree. In May 2016, our client married his current U.S. citizen wife. He retained our office on February 27, 2018 for his green card application. Our firm prepared and filed the I-130 Petition and I-485 Adjustment of Status Application on April 10, 2018. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices, fingerprint appointment, and work permits all came on time. Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our clients via conference call. On October 1, 2018, our client was interviewed at the Cleveland Ohio USCIS office. Attorney Sung Hee (Glen) Yu from our office accompanied our clients at their interview. Eventually, on October 1, 2018, his green card application was approved.
{ 0 comments }
CASE: I-140 (EB-3 Category) / Schedule A
EMPLOYER: Nursing / Rehabilitation Center
BENEFICIARY: Nepalese
LOCATION: Lincoln, NE
Our client is a registered nurse from Nepal licensed in the state of Nebraska. She came to the United States and currently works in the United States on her TPS status. Her current employer was willing to petition her for a third-preference employment immigrant visa petition (I-140).
Since she is a registered nurse, she is eligible for “Schedule A” classification. The Department of Labor (DOL) maintains a schedule of occupations in its regulations, Schedule A included, for which the individual permanent labor certification procedure is not required. The schedule of pre-certified occupations is referred to as Schedule A, and is included in DOL regulations at 20 CFR 656.10. Based on an occupation’s inclusion on Schedule A, an employer may file an immigrant visa petition (I-140) directly with the (USCIS) without first going to the DOL for a labor certification. Usually, prior to filing I-140 petitions (EB-2 or EB-3 category), the employer must file a Labor Certification to the Department of Labor. However, for Schedule A cases, the employer does not have to go through the labor certification process. The position of Professional Nurses is included in Schedule A.
Our client has a nursing degree and has worked for the sponsor-employer. Our firm told her that her employer can petition her as a Registered Nurse under the schedule A category. Our office was retained on April 12, 2018 and started on her Prevailing Wage Request.
We filed the I-140 application on July 31, 2018 via premium processing. We included the job offer letter, the notice of filing, and other necessary supporting documents. However, the USCIS issued Request for Evidence on August 8, 2018 and requested our client to submit the Petitioner’s financial record to show ability to pay the proffered wage for our client. We filed the Response to RFE on August 21, 2018 and eventually, on September 1, 2018, the I-140 was approved.
{ 0 comments }
CASE: I-140 (Derivative Beneficiary) and Adjustment of Status
CLIENT: Nepalese
LOCATION: Omaha, Nebraska
Our client retained us to apply for her green card application. Our client was born and raised in Nepal. Her husband became the beneficiary of an approved EB-2 I-140 petition from his employer and got his green card in May 2017 through our firm’s legal assistance. She married her husband in September 2016 while her husband’s green card application was pending. Thus, she was qualified as a derivative applicant. She retained our office in October 2016.
Once retained, our firm prepared and filed the Adjustment of Status Application on October 3, 2016 for our client. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices, fingerprint appointment, and a work permit all came on time. However, on April 7, 2017, the USCIS issued Request for Evidence for our client and requested her to submit documents regarding her maintenance of status in the U.S. and documentations regarding bona fide nature of her marriage to her husband. On April 17, 2017, our office filed the Response for RFE to USCIS. In June 2017, the USCIS schedule our client’s adjustment of status interview at Omaha USCIS Field Office.
Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our client through conference calls. On July 26, 2017, our client was interviewed at the Omaha USCIS Field office in Nebraska. Nevertheless, her case was remained pending until May of this year. Finally, the USCIS issued another Request for Evidence (RFE) and requested our client to submit the updated medical record (I-693). Our client submitted the updated I-693 to USCIS promptly. Eventually, on June 25, 2018, her green card application was approved.
{ 0 comments }
CASE: Marriage-Based Adjustment of Status
NATIONALITY: Nepalese
LOCATION: Cleveland, Ohio
Our client is from Nepal who came to the U.S. on a F-1 student visa in 2014. In December 2017, our client married her current U.S. citizen husband. After she got married, she retained our office for her green card application. Our firm prepared and filed the I-130 Petition and I-485 Adjustment of Status Application on January 19, 2018. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices, fingerprint appointment, and work permits all came on time. Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our clients at our office as well. On May 9, 2018, our client was interviewed at the Cleveland Ohio USCIS office. On May 15, 2018, her green card application was approved.
{ 0 comments }
CASE: J-1 Waiver of the Two-Year Foreign Residency Requirement, No Objection Statement
NATIONALITY: Nepalese
LOCATION: Portland, OR
Our Nepalese client came to the U.S. on a J-1 exchange visitor’s visa for his research program. Thereafter, he changed his status from J-1 to O-1 to work in the United States. His employer intended to file an I-140 petition for him, and with the I-140 petition, our client plans to file adjustment of status application in the U.S. However, his J-1 visa made him subject to the two-year foreign resident requirement. Due to the two-year foreign residency requirement, he had to obtain a waiver first before he can file an adjustment of status application.
After he retained our firm, we prepared and filed a waiver request through a No Objection Statement (NOS) from the Nepalese Embassy in the United States. Our office contacted the Nepalese Embassy in Washington D.C. to make sure we knew all the requirements needed for their office to issue a no objection statement. The Embassy requested numerous documents including a statement of reason for the waiver, the applicant’s resume, a copy of his valid Nepalese passport, a copy of DS-2019, and a copy of Third Party Bar Code Page
On April 20, 2017, the J-1 Waiver (Form DS-3035) Application was filed to the Department of State. We also sent a request to the Nepalese Embassy to issue a No Objection Statement and recommend this waiver based on the fact that our client would have been eligible to file an employment-based adjustment of status application but for the waiver.
The Nepalese Embassy eventually issued a No Objection Statement for our client, and sent this letter to the State Department’s Waiver Review Division. On June 12, 2017, the Waiver Review Division issued a favorable recommendation based on the No Objection statement. The CIS then issued a receipt and an I-612 approval notice on January 31, 2018.
{ 0 comments }
CASE: I-485 Adjustment of Status based on Approved I-140 (EB-3 Category) / Schedule A
EMPLOYER: Nursing / Rehabilitation Center
BENEFICIARY: Nepalese
LOCATION: Houston, TX
Our client’s beneficiary is a registered nurse from Nepal and licensed in the state of Texas. She came to the United States and currently works in the United States on her TPS (Temporary Protected Status). Her current employer was willing to petition her for a third-preference employment immigrant visa petition (I-140).
Since she is a registered nurse, he is eligible for “Schedule A” classification. The Department of Labor (DOL) maintains a schedule of occupations in its regulations, Schedule A included, for which the individual permanent labor certification procedure is not required. The schedule of pre-certified occupations is referred to as Schedule A, and is included in DOL regulations at 20 CFR 656.10. Based on an occupation’s inclusion on Schedule A, an employer may file an immigrant visa petition (I-140) directly with the (USCIS) without first going to the DOL for a labor certification. Usually, prior to filing I-140 petitions (EB-2 or EB-3 category), the employer must file a Labor Certification to the Department of Labor. However, for Schedule A cases, the employer does not have to go through the labor certification process. The position of Professional Nurses is included in Schedule A.
Our client has a Bachelor of nursing degree and has worked for the sponsor-employer. Our firm told her that her employer can petition her as a Registered Nurse under the schedule A category. Our office was retained on June 15, 2016 and started on her Prevailing Wage Request.
We filed the I-140 application on October 20, 2016 via premium processing. We included the job offer letter, the notice of filing, and other necessary supporting documents. However, on November 4, 2016, the USCIS issued Request for Evidence and asked our client to submit the copy of her bachelor’s degree certificate. Our office filed the response to USCIS on November 7, 2016. Eventually, on November 15, 2016, the I-140 was approved.
Then, we proceeded with our client’s I-485 adjustment of status application. We prepared and file our client’s adjustment of status application along with supporting documents to USCIS on December 1, 2016. Eventually, our client’s adjustment application was approved by the USCIS on October 20, 2017 without any Request for Evidence. After a long wait, our client is finally a green card holder.
{ 0 comments }
CASE: I-485 Adjustment of Status Based on Approved I-140 (EB-2)
EMPLOYER: Sales Leads Provider in Omaha Nebraska
BENEFICIARY: Nepali Senior Software Developer – Web Application
Our client is from Nepal, who is currently working in the United States as a Senior Software Developer under F-1 (OPT) status. His current employer was willing to do an immigration petition for him, second-preference. Our client has a Master of Management Information Systems degree in the United States. After talking to our client, our firm concluded that his employer can petition him as a Senior Software Developer – Web Application. Based on our client’s educational, professional and work background, our office determined that he is clearly eligible for EB-2 classification.
Prior to filing PERM, our firm prepared the prevailing wage request, job order, advertisements, internal job posting, recruitment report, and all other steps which are important pre-PERM filing. Take note that PERM could be filed at least 60 days from the job posting date or 30 days from the last ad. On September 29, 2015, the prevailing wage request was filed. After we obtained Prevailing Wage determination, our office filed the job order on December 11, 2015. On March 9, 2016, we promptly filed PERM. Eventually, on June 23, 2016, the PERM Labor Certification was approved – an EB2 position for the Nepali beneficiary.
We then proceeded with the I-140 Petition filing. We submitted the “ability to pay” letter for the I-140 petition application. We included the job offer letter, employer’s tax records, and other necessary supporting documents.
The I-140 Petition was filed on July 26, 2016 via premium processing service. Eventually, on August 8, 2016, the I-140 EB2 Petition for our Nepalese client was approved without any Request for Evidence (RFE).
When we filed his I-140, our office concurrently filed an I-485 adjustment of status application for his green card. However, on March 29, 2017, the USCIS issued Request for Evidence (RFE) and asked our client to submit the document to demonstrate his authorized employment. Our office filed Response to RFE immediately. Eventually, on May 3, 2017, his I-485 adjustment of status application was approved by the USCIS. Now, our client is a green card holder.
{ 0 comments }
CASE: I-485 Adjustment of Status / Motion to Terminate Removal Proceedings Based on an Approved I-130 Immediate Relative Spousal Petition
CLIENT: Nepalese
LOCATION: Houston, TX
Our client is a Nepalese citizen who came to the U.S. on an F-1 Student Visa. Our client and his wife married in August 2013. When they were married, our client’s wife was a green card holder. Our client’s wife filed an I-130 petition for our client in August 2013 and it was approved by the USCIS later. Our client filed his adjustment of status application along with the I-130 petition, but it was denied due to his failure to maintain status. After his I-485 adjustment of status application was denied, a Notice to Appear was issued against our client, and he was placed in removal proceeding.
His wife became a naturalized U.S. citizen in July 2015. Our client contacted our office and consulted with us for his potential relief. Based on the approved I-130 and his wife’s recent naturalization, we determined that we could file joint motion to terminate his proceedings. Our client retained our office on July 15, 2015.
On July 27, 2015, our office filed a request to join in a Motion to terminate proceedings with the I-485 application and supporting documents. However, we did not get any response from the Houston DHS office regarding their consent to terminate our client’s proceedings. Ultimately, the Immigration Judge granted the Motion to terminate without prejudice in September 2015.
After the multiple follow-ups, our office filed a Motion to Terminate Removal Proceedings with the I-485 application and supporting documents to the Houston Immigration Court on January 6, 2016. The DHS counsel in Houston did not oppose the Motion to Terminate Removal Proceedings. Ultimately, the Immigration Judge granted the Motion to Terminate Removal Proceedings without prejudice on January 27, 2016.
After his removal proceeding was terminated, our client retained us again for his I-485 adjustment of status application. Our firm prepared and filed the I-485 Adjustment of Status Application on April 6, 2016. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices, fingerprint appointment, and work permit all came on time. Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our clients via conference call. On April 25, 2017, our client was interviewed at the Houston, Texas USCIS. Attorney Sung Hee (Glen) Yu from our office accompanied our clients. After the interview, his green card application was approved.
{ 0 comments }