CASE: Marriage-Based Green Card (Same Sex Marriage Case)

CLIENT: Filipino

LOCATION: San Jose, CA

Our client came to the United States from the Philippines with a J-1 exchange visitor’s visa. With our firm’s legal assistance, he got his J-1 waiver for his two-year foreign residency requirement.  In June 2018, he married his U.S. Citizen same-sex spouse in Idaho.

On June 26, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court held that restricting U.S. federal interpretation of “marriage” and “spouse” to apply only to heterosexual unions, by Section 3 of the defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. ___ (2013). After Windsor decision, the USCIS implemented a new policy that the USCIS officer must review immigration via petitions filed on behalf of a same-sex spouse in the same manner as those filed on behalf of an opposite-sex spouse. As long as a same-sex couple is married in a U.S. state that recognizes same-sex marriage, their marriage shall be considered a valid marriage under the immigration law. 

They married in Idaho where the same-sex marriage is recognized. Our client contacted our office and retained us in January 2019 for his I-130 petition and I-485 adjustment of status application. Our firm prepared and filed the I-130 petition and I-485 adjustment of status application, together with all necessary supporting documents, on February 1, 2019. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices, fingerprint appointment, and work permits all came on time. 

Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our clients via conference calls. On January 13, 2020, our client was interviewed at the Santa Clara, California USCIS office. The interview went well and his green card application was approved on the same day.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: I-485 Adjustment of Status / 245(k)

APPLICANT: Filipina Speech Language Pathologist

LOCATION: North Dakota

Our client has a current employer that was willing to petition her for a second-preference petition (I-140).  Our client has a master’s degree in speech language pathology, a valid North Dakota speech language pathologist license, and has worked for her current employer since March 2014. Based on our client’s education and work background, our office determined that she is eligible for EB-2 classification for her I-140 petition.  

Prior to filing PERM, our firm prepared the prevailing wage request, job order, advertisements, internal job posting, recruitment report, and all other steps which are important pre-PERM filing. Take note that the PERM application could be filed at least 60 days from the job posting date or 30 days from the last ad. Within a week from our retention, the prevailing wage request was filed.  After we obtained the PW determination, our office filed the job order. On January 29, 2019, we promptly filed PERM. Eventually, on April 26, 2019, the PERM Labor Certification was approved – an EB2 position for the Filipina beneficiary. 

We then proceeded with the I-140 Petition filing. We submitted the “ability to pay” letter for the I-140 petition application. We included the job offer letter, employee’s most recent W-2 record, and other necessary supporting documents.

The I-140 Petition was filed on May 28, 2019 via regular processing service. Eventually, on August 22, 2019, the I-140 EB2 Petition for our Filipina client was approved without any Request for Evidence (RFE). We filed her I-140 petition and I-485 adjustment of status application concurrently. 

However, our office was informed that our client’s DS-2019 was not extended by her employer and she has continuously worked for her employer without the DHS’ authorization. Thus, she worked without authorization and overstayed her visa status. 

Section 245(k) of the Immigration and Nationality Act can render the normal bars to adjustment of status found in section 245(c)(2), (c)(7), and (c)(8) inapplicable to certain employment-based adjustment of status applicants who, since their last lawful admission to the United States have not, for an aggregate period of more than 180 days: 

1. Failed to maintain, continuously, a lawful status; 
2. Engaged in unauthorized employment; or 
3. Otherwise violated the terms and conditions of his or her admission

INA §245(k). 

An eligible derivative of an alien may benefit from section 245(k) in his or her own right if he or she has failed to maintain continuously a lawful status, worked without authorization, or otherwise violated the terms and conditions of his or her admission for an aggregate of 180 days or less pursuant to a lawful admission. 

(See page 2, Neufeld Memorandum July 14, 2008, “Applicability of section 245(k) to Certain Employment-Based Adjustment of Status Applications filed under Section 245(a). 

At least, our client has not accrued over 180 days of “failure to maintain lawful status” nor over 180 days of “unauthorized employment”, and as such, she was still eligible to adjust status based on the I-485 filing through INA 245(k).

As mentioned above, our office filed an I-485 adjustment of status application for our client and her husband along with her I-140 petition. Our office also submitted a detailed cover brief and explained why our client is still eligible for the adjustment of status through 245K subsection despite her overstay and unauthorized employment.  Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices and fingerprint appointment came on time.

Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our client via conference calls as well. On January 6, 2020, our client was interviewed at Minneapolis, Minnesota USCIS office. Attorney Sung Hee (Glen) Yu from our office also accompanied our clients. Though interview was thoroughly held, on the same day of the interview, their I-485 applications were approved by the USCIS. 

{ 0 comments }

CASE: PERM Labor Certification    
EMPLOYER:  Food Company Petitioner in Christiansted, VI
BENEFICIARY: Filipino Warehouse Supervisory Training Specialist

Our client is from the Philippines. His prospective employer was willing to do an immigration petition for him, third-preference. Our client has a Bachelor’s degree in Education. After talking to our client, our firm concluded that his employer can petition him as a Warehouse Supervisory Training Specialist. Based on our client’s education and working background, our office determined that he is eligible for EB-3 classification. 

Prior to filing PERM, our firm prepared the prevailing wage request, job order, advertisements, internal job posting, recruitment report, and all other steps which are important pre-PERM filing. Take note that PERM could be filed at least 60 days from the job posting date or 30 days from the last ad. On January 21, 2019, the prevailing wage request was filed.  After we obtained Prevailing Wage determination, our office filed the job order on May 10, 2019. On September 7, 2019, we promptly filed PERM. Eventually, on December 18, 2019, the PERM Labor Certification was approved – an EB3 position for the Filipino beneficiary. Now our client can file the I-140 petition. 

{ 0 comments }

CASE: J-1 Waiver (No Objection Statement)

NATIONALITY: Philippines

LOCATION: Las Vegas, NV

Our client came from the Philippines on a J-1 in July 2017 to work as a teacher. According to her DS-2019, she was subject to the two-year foreign residency requirement. After her authorized stay period expired, she remained in the United States. 

In June 2019, she got married to her U.S. citizen husband and later on consulted with our firm for her J-1 visa waiver prior to applying for adjustment of status. If someone is subject to the two-year foreign residency requirement, he or she cannot get a green card in the United States until he or she fulfills the requirement or obtains a waiver.

Upon retention, our office promptly prepared a waiver request through a No Objection Statement (NOS) from the Philippine Embassy in the United States and eventually the EVP in the Philippines.

On July 19, 2019, the J-1 Waiver Application (Form DS-3035) was filed to the Department of State.  On September 10, 2019, our office sent our client’s materials to the Waiver Review Committee in Manila, Philippines.  Then, the Waiver Review Committee forwarded the materials and favorable recommendation to the Philippine Embassy in D.C. who eventually issued a No Objection Statement.

On December 12, 2019, the Waiver Review Division issued a favorable recommendation based on the No Objection statement.  Eventually, on December 23, 2019, the USCIS issued an I-612 approval notice for the waiver. Now, our client can file for her adjustment status application along with her U.S. Citizen husband’s I-130 petition for her.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: Marriage-Based Green Card 

CLIENT: Filipino

LOCATION: Katy, TX

Our client came to the United States from the Philippines on a F-1 student visa. He married his current wife, who is a green card holder, in March 2017.  After marriage, his wife filed an I-130 petition on behalf of our client in April 2017. This I-130 petition was approved on January 15, 2019. Our office helped our client in the I-130 petition process. 

Our client retained our office again for his I-485 adjustment of status application. We could file the I-485 application because the priority date for F2A category was current at the time of filing. Our office prepared and filed an I-485 adjustment of status application, together with all necessary supporting documents, on February 4, 2019. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices, fingerprint appointment, and work permits all came on time. 

Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our clients via conference call. On December 3, 2019, our client was interviewed at the Houston, Texas USCIS office. The interview went well, and the priority date for our client was current at the time of the interview as well. Eventually, on December 16, 2019, her green card application was approved.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: J-1 Waiver (No Objection Statement)

NATIONALITY: Philippines

LOCATION: Bell, CA

Our client came from the Philippines on a J-1 in September 2016 to work as a teacher. Based on her DS-2019, she was subject to the two-year foreign residency requirement. After her authorized stay period expired, she remained in the United States. 

In April 2019, she got married to her U.S. citizen husband and later on consulted with our firm for her J-1 visa waiver prior to applying for adjustment of status. If someone is subject to the two-year foreign residency requirement, he or she cannot get a green card in the United States until he or she fulfills the requirement or obtains a waiver.

Upon retention, our office promptly prepared a waiver request through a No Objection Statement (NOS) from the Philippine Embassy in the United States and eventually the EVP in the Philippines.

On June 25, 2019, the J-1 Waiver Application (Form DS-3035) was filed to the Department of State.  On September 10, 2019, our office sent our client’s materials to the Waiver Review Committee in Manila, Philippines.  Then, the Waiver Review Committee forwarded the materials and favorable recommendation to the Philippine Embassy in D.C. who eventually issued a No Objection Statement.

On December 9, 2019, the Waiver Review Division issued a favorable recommendation based on the No Objection statement.  Eventually, on December 19, 2019, the USCIS issued an I-612 approval notice for the waiver. Now, our client can file for her adjustment status application along with her U.S. Citizen husband’s I-130 petition for her.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: PERM Labor Certification    
EMPLOYER: Fabric Manufacturer
BENEFICIARY: Filipina General Merchandise Expert Sewer
LOCATION: Chagrin Falls, OH

Our client is a fabric manufacturer in Ohio. They do have a prospective employee from the Philippines and they were willing to petition her for a skilled worker, third-preference petition (I-140). Their prospective employee has more than 2 years of experience as a sewer. After talking to our client, our firm concluded that they can petition her as a general merchandise expert sewer. Our client eventually retained us on February 28, 2019. 

Prior to filing PERM, our firm prepared the prevailing wage request, job order, advertisements, internal job posting, recruitment report, and all other steps which are important pre-PERM filing. Take note that PERM could be filed at least 60 days from the job posting date or 30 days from the last ad. On March 6, 2019, the prevailing wage request was filed.  After we got the PW determination, our office filed the job order on June 26, 2019. On September 5, 2019, we promptly filed PERM. Eventually, on December 13, 2019, the PERM Labor Certification was approved – an EB3 position for the Filipina beneficiary. Now our client can file the I-140 petition.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: I-485 Adjustment of Status / I-140 (EB-2 Category) / Schedule A 

APPLICANT: Filipina Physical Therapist

LOCATION: Philip, South Dakota

Our client is a physical therapist from the Philippines who is currently working for her employer on a H-1B status. Her current employer-sponsor was willing to petition her for a second-preference employment immigrant visa petition (I-140). Since she was a physical therapist, she was eligible for “Schedule A” classification.

The Department of Labor (DOL) maintains a schedule of occupations in its regulations, Schedule A included, for which the individual permanent labor certification procedure is not required. The schedule of pre-certified occupations is referred to as Schedule A, and is included in DOL regulations at 20 CFR 656.10. Based on an occupation’s inclusion on Schedule A, an employer may file an immigrant visa petition (I-140) directly with the (USCIS) without first going to the DOL for a labor certification. Usually, prior to filing I-140 petitions (EB-2 or EB-3 category), the employer must file a Labor Certification to the Department of Labor. However, for Schedule A cases, the employer does not have to go through the labor certification process. The position of Physical Therapist is included in Schedule A.

Our client has U.S. equivalent Master’s degrees in Physical Therapy and is a licensed physical therapist in the State of South Dakota. Our office was retained on September 10, 2018 and we filed the Prevailing Wage Determination immediately.

We filed the I-140 application on April 22, 2019 via premium processing. We included the job offer letter, the notice of filing, employment letter, and other necessary supporting documents. In our cover brief, we included the “ability to pay” argument and why nurse practitioners must fall under the Schedule A designation.  However, on April 26, 2019, the USCIS Nebraska Service Center issued Request for Evidence and requested our client to submit her marriage certificate and a letter from her employer stating the signed date of the notice of filing document. Our office filed the Response to RFE on April 29, 2019. Eventually, on May 2, 2019, the USCIS Nebraska Service Center approved her EB-2 I-140 petition. 

Once her I-140 petition was approved, she retained our office again and determined to file an adjustment of status application for her and her immediate family members. On June 25, 2019, our office filed an I-485 adjustment of status application for our client and her family. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices and fingerprint appointment came on time.

Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our client via conference calls as well. On December 9, 2019, our client was interviewed at Omaha Nebraska USCIS office. The interview went well, our client and her family members’ adjustment of status applications were approved by the USCIS on the same day of the interview.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: Marriage-Based Adjustment of Status
CLIENT: Filipina
LOCATION: Cleveland, OH 

Our client came to the United States in June 2018 with a J-1 Exchange Visitor visa from the Philippines.  Her J-1 visa was not subject to the two-year foreign residency requirement, so she could apply for the adjustment of status in the United States without a waiver.  She married a U.S. Citizen in May 2019 and retained our office on June 4, 2019 for her adjustment of status application.  Our firm prepared and filed the I-130 Petition and I-485 Adjustment of Status Application on June 17, 2019.  Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices, fingerprint appointment, and the work permit all came on time. There was no Request for Evidence.  Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our clients at our office. On December 9, 2019, our client was interviewed at the Cleveland, Ohio USCIS Field Office.  Attorney JP Sarmiento from our office accompanied them at the interview as well.  On December 9, 2019, her green card application was approved. 

{ 0 comments }

CASE: EB-3 I-485 Adjustment of Status

EMPLOYER: Public School

BENEFICIARY: Filipina Elementary School Teacher

LOCATION: New Mexico

Our client has a current employer that was willing to petition her for a third-preference petition (I-140).  Our client has a Bachelor’s degree in English, a valid New Mexico Teaching license, and has worked for her current employer since 2016. Based on our client’s education and work background, our office determined that she is eligible for EB-3 classification for her I-140 petition.  Our client eventually retained us in June 2017.

Prior to filing PERM, our firm prepared the prevailing wage request, job order, advertisements, internal job posting, recruitment report, and all other steps which are important pre-PERM filing. Take note that the PERM application could be filed at least 60 days from the job posting date or 30 days from the last ad. Within a week from our retention, the prevailing wage request was filed.  After we obtained the PW determination, our office filed the job order on November 1, 2017. On April 13, 2018, we promptly filed PERM. 

However, on August 13, 2018, the Department of Labor issued a request for audit. The DOL requested documents from Petitioner to determine whether the recruitment process was done properly. In response to the Audit request, our office prepared the response to Audit brief along with Employer’s declaration, notice of filing, and recruitment documentation on August 22, 2018.  Eventually, on October 23, 2018, the PERM Labor Certification was approved – an EB3 position for the Filipina beneficiary. 

We then proceeded with the I-140 Petition filing. Our client already had her approved I-140 from her old employer with priority date of October 2010. 

Under 8 CFR 204.5(e):

“Retention of section 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) priority date. A petition approved on behalf of an alien under sections 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Act accords the alien the priority date of the approved petition for any subsequently filed petition for any classification under sections 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Act for which the alien may qualify. In the event that the alien is the beneficiary of multiple petitions under sections 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Act, the alien shall be entitled to the earliest priority date. A petition revoked under sections 204(e) or 205 of the Act will not confer a priority date, nor will any priority date be established as a result of a denied petition. A priority date is not transferable to another alien.”

As mentioned above, our client’s approved I-140 petition was not denied, was actually approved, and was never revoked at any point. Thus, by virtue of 8 CFR 204.5(e), this succeeding I-140 Petition by our client’s current employer for our client is entitled to the previous priority date.

We submitted the “ability to pay” letter for the I-140 petition application. We included the job offer letter, employer’s tax records, her previous I-140 approval notice and other necessary supporting documents.

The I-140 Petition was filed on November 1, 2018 via premium processing service. Eventually, on November 6, 2018, the I-140 EB3 Petition for our Filipina client was approved without any Request for Evidence (RFE). Also, the approved I-140 retained our client’s old priority date. 

Once her I-140 petition was approved, she retained our office again and determined to file an adjustment of status application for her. On December 6, 2018, our office filed an I-485 adjustment of status application for our client. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices and fingerprint appointment came on time.

Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our client via conference calls as well. On September 9, 2019, our client was interviewed at Albuquerque New Mexico USCIS office. On November 25, 2019, her I-485 adjustment of status application was approved by the USCIS. 

{ 0 comments }