CASE: Marriage-Based Adjustment of Status

CLIENT: Filipina

LOCATION: Des Moines, IA

Our client came to the United States in March 2013 with a H-1B visa from the Philippines. Later, she married a U.S. Citizen in December 2017 and retained our office for her petition and adjustment of status application. She also asked us to file her minor daughter’s (Petitioner’s step-daughter) adjustment of status application.

Once retained, our firm prepared and filed the I-130 petition and I-485 adjustment of status application on August 8, 2018. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices, fingerprint appointment, and work permits all came on time. There were no requests for evidence.

Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our clients via conference calls. On May 21, 2019, our clients were interviewed at the Des Moines, Iowa USCIS office. On the same day of their interview, our client and her daughter’s green card applications were approved.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: I-140 (EB-2 Category) / Schedule A / Premium Processing

EMPLOYER: Nursing Care Facility

BENEFICIARY: Filipina

LOCATION: Houston, TX

Our client is an F-1 student from the Philippines. Her prospective employer-sponsor was willing to petition her for a second-preference employment immigrant visa petition (I-140). Since she has a registered nurse license and the proffered position for her is a nurse manager at the nursing care facility, the petition wanted to try going for a “Schedule A” classification. They also wanted to do EB2 (requiring at least a Masters degree or Bachelors degree + 5 yrs experience).

The Department of Labor (DOL) maintains a schedule of occupations in its regulations, Schedule A included, for which the individual permanent labor certification procedure is not required. The schedule of pre-certified occupations is referred to as Schedule A, and is included in DOL regulations at 20 CFR 656.10. Based on an occupation’s inclusion on Schedule A, an employer may file an immigrant visa petition (I-140) directly with the (USCIS) without having to file a Labor Certification with the Department of Labor. Usually, prior to filing I-140 petitions (EB-2 or EB-3 category), the employer must file a Labor Certification to the Department of Labor. However, for Schedule A cases, the employer does not have to go through the labor certification process. We argued that the position of Nurse Manager should be classified under Schedule A. We argued that it falls under the broad spectrum of “professional nurse” occupations. We also argued that the job description has excerpts that fall under “professional nurse” and that the description justifies the requirements also of Bachelor’s degree in nursing and five years of related experiences.

Our client has a Bachelor’s degree in nursing and has more than five years of experience as a staff nurse. She also has a registered nursing license in the state of Texas. Our office was retained and we started on the Prevailing Wage Determination filing and other related matters.

Once the prevailing wage was determined, we filed the I-140 application on April 15, 2019 via premium processing. We included the job offer letter, the notice of filing, employment letter, and other necessary supporting documents. In our cover brief, we included the “ability to pay” argument and why the nurse manager position falls under a Schedule A and EB2 designation.

However, on April 25, 2019, the USCIS issued a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID). The USCIS argued that they cannot approve her I-140 petition because the proffered position, Nurse Manager, does not fall under Schedule A designation and it is not an EB-2 classified position. In our response brief, we cited the AAO decision and argued that positions other than “registered nurses” can fall under the definition of professional nurses, and thus fall under the Schedule A designation as well. The position of Nurse Manager for Petitioner, considering its job description, is a “position other than registered nurses that still falls within the definition of a professional nurse.” As to EB-2 classification argument, our office argued that the proffered position has the supervisory role and the complexity of job duties justify the EB-2 designation and the required 5 years experiences under the ONET Job Zone and the Department of Labor’s level. With this detailed response brief and other supporting documents, our office filed the Response to NOID to USCIS Texas Service Center on May 8, 2019.  

Eventually, on May 18, 2019, the USCIS Texas Service Center approved her EB-2 I-140 petition. Now, with the approved EB-2 I-140 petition (priority date for EB2 Philippines nationals is current), she can file her adjustment of status application.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: I-140 (EB-2 Category) / Schedule A / Premium Processing

EMPLOYER: Nursing Care Facility

BENEFICIARY: Filipina

LOCATION: Houston, TX

Our client is an F-1 student from the Philippines. Her prospective employer-sponsor was willing to petition her for a second-preference employment immigrant visa petition (I-140). Since she has a registered nurse license and the proffered position for her is a nurse manager at the nursing care facility, the petition wanted to try going for a “Schedule A” classification. They also wanted to do EB2 (requiring at least a Masters degree or Bachelors degree + 5 yrs experience).

The Department of Labor (DOL) maintains a schedule of occupations in its regulations, Schedule A included, for which the individual permanent labor certification procedure is not required. The schedule of pre-certified occupations is referred to as Schedule A, and is included in DOL regulations at 20 CFR 656.10. Based on an occupation’s inclusion on Schedule A, an employer may file an immigrant visa petition (I-140) directly with the (USCIS) without having to file a Labor Certification with the Department of Labor. Usually, prior to filing I-140 petitions (EB-2 or EB-3 category), the employer must file a Labor Certification to the Department of Labor. However, for Schedule A cases, the employer does not have to go through the labor certification process. We argued that the position of Nurse Manager should be classified under Schedule A. We argued that it falls under the broad spectrum of “professional nurse” occupations. We also argued that the job description has excerpts that fall under “professional nurse” and that the description justifies the requirements also of Bachelor’s degree in nursing and five years of related experiences.

Our client has a Bachelor’s degree in nursing and has more than five years of experience as a staff nurse. She also has a registered nursing license in the state of Texas. Our office was retained and we started on the Prevailing Wage Determination filing and other related matters.

Once the prevailing wage was determined, we filed the I-140 application on April 15, 2019 via premium processing. We included the job offer letter, the notice of filing, employment letter, and other necessary supporting documents. In our cover brief, we included the “ability to pay” argument and why the nurse manager position falls under a Schedule A and EB2 designation.

However, on April 25, 2019, the USCIS issued a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID). The USCIS argued that they cannot approve her I-140 petition because the proffered position, Nurse Manager, does not fall under Schedule A designation and it is not an EB-2 classified position. In our response brief, we cited the AAO decision and argued that positions other than “registered nurses” can fall under the definition of professional nurses, and thus fall under the Schedule A designation as well. The position of Nurse Manager for Petitioner, considering its job description, is a “position other than registered nurses that still falls within the definition of a professional nurse.” As to EB-2 classification argument, our office argued that the proffered position has the supervisory role and the complexity of job duties justify the EB-2 designation and the required 5 years experiences under the ONET Job Zone and the Department of Labor’s level. With this detailed response brief and other supporting documents, our office filed the Response to NOID to USCIS Texas Service Center on May 8, 2019.  

Eventually, on May 18, 2019, the USCIS Texas Service Center approved her EB-2 I-140 petition. Now, with the approved EB-2 I-140 petition (priority date for EB2 Philippines nationals is current), she can file her adjustment of status application.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: H-1B Visa Petition

PETITIONER: School District in Mohave Valley, AZ

BENEFICIARY: Filipina Elementary Special Education Teacher

ISSUES: Cap-Exempt, Research Organization

Our client is a public school district affiliated with several institutions of higher education. They contacted our office in March 2019 to seek legal assistance from our office for their foreign employee. The beneficiary is an Elementary Special Education Teacher from the Philippines who has been working for this employer for the last 4 years under J-1 status. Though she was subject to INA 212(e), two-year foreign residency requirement, she already obtained a J-1 waiver from the USCIS.

The proffered position for the Beneficiary is an Elementary Special Education Teacher. We showed that this is a “specialty occupation” because the minimum requirement for this position is a Bachelor’s Degree in Education or its equivalent.

In the first week of April, the numerical cap of H-1B visas for fiscal year 2020 was already reached. However, our client is qualified for cap-exempt petitions since it is a non-profit organization affiliated with an Institution of Higher Education as defined in 8 C.F.R. 214.2(h)(19)(iii)(B).

Once retained, our office filed the H-1B visa petition with various supporting documents on April 19, 2019, via premium processing. There were no Requests for Evidence during the processing of the H-1B. Eventually, our client’s H-1B application was approved on May 1, 2019.  She can now work for her employer for three years on an H-1B status.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: I-751

APPLICANT: Filipina

LOCATION: Batavia, NY

Our client contacted our office in January of 2018 regarding her I-751 application.

She is from the Philippines and she married a U.S. citizen in August 2014. Through her marriage she obtained a 2-year conditional green card in May of 2016.  Her conditional residency terminated in May 2018.

To comply with immigration requirements, our client and her husband had to file an I-751 Joint Petition to Remove Conditions. She retained our office again on February 1, 2018, and our office prepared an I-751 application for our client with other supplemental exhibits.

On February 21, 2018, our office filed an I-751 application to the USCIS with multiple affidavits from her friends and family members, joint bank statements, joint taxes, utility bills, insurance policies, and photos of our client and her husband to demonstrate the bona fideness of their marriage.

Once the application was filed, the fingerprint notice was issued two weeks later. There was no RFE issuance or interview request for our client’s I-751 application. As a result, on May 3, 2019, the USCIS approved our client’s I-751 application and our client received her 10-year green card which removed the conditions.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: H-1B Extension

PETITIONER: Elementary School

BENEFICIARY: Filipina Elementary School Teacher

LOCATION: Crownpoint, New Mexico

Our client is a public grant elementary school for Native Indians in New Mexico. They contacted our office to seek assistance from our office for their foreign employee. The beneficiary is from the Philippines and she obtained her Bachelor’s degree in English. The proffered position for the Beneficiary is an elementary school teacher which we argued qualifies as a specialty occupation

The foreign beneficiary in this case already had her H-1B from our client last year.  She also has an approved I-140 petition which allows her to get three year extension. Her H-1B status was not yet expired, and she wanted to extend her H-1B status.

After retention, our office promptly filed the H-1B visa petition with various supporting documents on December 3, 2018 via regular processing.  Since this petition was based on an extension, this petition was exempt from the annual cap of the H-1B. Thus, we could file prior to April 1, 2019.  Eventually, our client’s H-1B Petition was approved on April 9, 2019 without any RFE. Now the Beneficiary can work for her Petitioner-Employer as an H-1B visa holder and she can continuously work there.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: I-485 / I-140 (EB-1C Category: Executives and Managers of Multinational Organizations)

APPLICANT: Filipino Executive

LOCATION: Las Vegas, NV

Our client is the CEO of a multinational adventure travel company in Las Vegas.  He is from the Philippines, and has worked for its parent company as an Executive. He came to the United States in January 2015 on a L-1A visa to open a new office.  Our client eventually retained us for his I-140 EB1C and subsequent I-485 adjustment of status application.

An employer can petition for its foreign employee under INA § 203(b)(1)(C) if it demonstrates the following: (C) Certain multinational executives and managers – An alien is described in this subparagraph if the alien, in the 3 years preceding the time of the alien’s application for classification and admission into the United States under this subparagraph, has been employed for at least 1 year by a firm or corporation or other legal entity or an affiliate or subsidiary thereof and the alien seeks to enter the United States in order to continue to render services to the same employer or to a subsidiary or affiliate thereof in a capacity that is managerial or executive.

According to the INA §101(a)(44), 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(44) and 8 C.F.R §204.5(j)(2), “executive capacity” means an assignment in an organization in which the employee primarily: (1) Directs the management of the organization or a component or function; (2) Establishes goals and policies; (3) Exercise wide latitude in discretionary decision making; and (4) Receives only general supervision or direction from higher level executives, board of directors or stockholders.

Also, above the mentioned statutes define “managerial capacity” as an assignment with the organization in which the employee personally: (1) Manages the organization, department, subdivision, function or component; (2) Supervises and controls the work of other supervisory, professional or managerial employees, or manages an essential function within the organization or department or subdivision of the organization; (3) Has authority to hire and fire or recommend personnel actions (if another directly supervises employees), or if no direct supervision, functions at a senior level; and (4) Exercises discretion over day-to-day operations of the activity or function.

After our office was retained, we prepared a thorough cover letter and obtained all necessary supporting documents from our client and the petitioning company. In our brief, we clearly demonstrated that our client met the requirements set forth in the INA §203(b)(1)(C).  First, the prospective U.S. employer (Petitioner-Company) has been doing business for at least 1 year. Second, the prospective employer (Petitioner) in the United States is the same employer or a subsidiary or affiliate of the firm or corporation or other legal entity by which the alien was employed abroad.  Third, if the worker is already employed in the United States, he or she was employed outside the United States for at least 1 year in the 3 years preceding admission as a non-immigrant in an executive or managerial capacity by the petitioner or by its parent branch, subsidiary, or affiliate. Last, the alien is to be employed in the United States in a managerial or executive capacity.

In this case, the Petitioner-company has been doing business for 3 years in the United States. In addition, Petitioner-Company is the wholly-owned subsidiary of its Filipino parent company where our client was employed for 6 years. Moreover, our client was employed outside the U.S. for at least 1 year in the 3 years preceding admission as a non-immigrant in an Executive or Managerial Capacity by the Petitioner’s parent company in the Philippines.  Our client served as an executive for the parent company. Lastly, our client is to be employed in the United States as a president for the petitioner.

On the application package, we included a detailed job offer letter, employment verification letter from our client’s previous employer (parent company), an organization chart, and a dispatch order.  Also, we included evidence regarding the relationship between the Petitioner-Company and its Parent company in the Philippines. The evidence included a copy of the certificate of ownership, a copy of the articles of incorporation, a copy the business registration certificate, a copy of the financial statements.  The I-140 Petition was filed on September 11, 2017. On July 11, 2018, the I-140 petition was approved with no Requests for Evidence.

While the I-140 petition was pending, our office filed the I-485 adjustment of status applications for him and his wife. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices and fingerprint appointment came on time.

Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our client via conference call as well. On April 8, 2019, our client was interviewed at Las Vegas, Nevada USCIS office. Eventually, on May 1, 2019, our clients’ green card applications were approved.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: I-140 (EB-2 Category) / Schedule A / Premium Processing

EMPLOYER: Nursing Care Facility

BENEFICIARY: Filipina Physical Therapist

LOCATION: Philip, South Dakota

Our client is a physical therapist from the Philippines who is currently working for her employer on an H-1B status. Her current employer-sponsor was willing to petition her for a second-preference employment immigrant visa petition (I-140). Since she is a physical therapist, she is eligible for “Schedule A” classification.

The Department of Labor (DOL) maintains a schedule of occupations in its regulations, Schedule A included, for which the individual permanent labor certification procedure is not required. The schedule of pre-certified occupations is referred to as Schedule A, and is included in DOL regulations at 20 CFR 656.10. Based on an occupation’s inclusion on Schedule A, an employer may file an immigrant visa petition (I-140) directly with the (USCIS) without first going to the DOL for a labor certification. Usually, prior to filing I-140 petitions (EB-2 or EB-3 category), the employer must file a Labor Certification to the Department of Labor. However, for Schedule A cases, the employer does not have to go through the labor certification process. The position of Physical Therapist is included in Schedule A.

Our client has U.S. equivalent Master’s degrees in Physical Therapy and is a licensed physical therapist in the State of South Dakota. Our office was retained on September 10, 2018 and we filed the Prevailing Wage Determination immediately.

We filed the I-140 application on April 22, 2019 via premium processing. We included the job offer letter, the notice of filing, employment letter, and other necessary supporting documents. In our cover brief, we included the “ability to pay” argument and why nurse practitioners must fall under the Schedule A designation.  However, on April 26, 2019, the USCIS Nebraska Service Center issued Request for Evidence and requested our client to submit her marriage certificate and a letter from her employer stating the signed date of the notice of filing document. Our office filed the Response to RFE on April 29, 2019.

Eventually, on May 2, 2019, the USCIS Nebraska Service Center approved her EB-2 I-140 petition. Now, with the approved EB-2 I-140 petition, she can file her adjustment of status application at any time.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: Marriage-Based Adjustment of Status

NATIONALITY: Filipina                                                                                                   

LOCATION: Columbus, OH

Our client is from the Philippines who came to the U.S. on a H-1B visa to work in the United States in 2016. In August 2017, our client married her current U.S. citizen husband.  She retained our office for her green card application. Our firm prepared and filed the I-130 Petition and I-485 Adjustment of Status Application on September 28, 2017. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices, fingerprint appointment, and work permits all came on time. Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our clients via conference calls. On April 15, 2019, our client was interviewed at the Columbus, OH USCIS office. Eventually, on April 23, 2019, her green card application was approved.

{ 0 comments }

CASE: PERM Labor Certification

EMPLOYER: Public Schools District

BENEFICIARY: Filipina Speech Language Pathologist

LOCATION: Crosby, North Dakota

Our client has a current employer that was willing to petition her for a second-preference petition (I-140).  Our client has a master’s degree in speech language pathology, a valid North Dakota speech language pathology license, and has worked for her current employer since March 2014. Based on our client’s education and work background, our office determined that she is clearly eligible for EB-2 classification for her I-140 petition.  

Prior to filing PERM, our firm prepared the prevailing wage request, job order, advertisements, internal job posting, recruitment report, and all other steps which are important pre-PERM filing. Take note that the PERM application could be filed at least 60 days from the job posting date or 30 days from the last ad. Within a week from our retention, the prevailing wage request was filed.  After we obtained the PW determination, our office filed the job order. On January 29, 2019, we promptly filed PERM.

Eventually, on April 26, 2019, the PERM Labor Certification was approved – an EB2 position for the Filipina beneficiary. Since her priority date is current, our client can file the I-140, I-485 green card application, and I-765 simultaneously.

{ 0 comments }